From: Heiner Kallweit Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 19:47:43 +0000 (+0200) Subject: pwm: meson: modify and simplify calculation in meson_pwm_get_state X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~2418^2~15 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6b9352f3f8a1a35faf0efc1ad1807ee303467796;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git pwm: meson: modify and simplify calculation in meson_pwm_get_state I don't see a reason why we should treat the case lo < hi differently and return 0 as period and duty_cycle. The current logic was added with c375bcbaabdb ("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state()"), Martin as original author doesn't remember why it was implemented this way back then. So let's handle it as normal use case and also remove the optimization for lo == 0. I think the improved readability is worth it. Fixes: c375bcbaabdb ("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state()") Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Reviewed-by: Dmitry Rokosov Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding --- diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c index 5732300..3865538 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c @@ -351,18 +351,8 @@ static int meson_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, channel->lo = FIELD_GET(PWM_LOW_MASK, value); channel->hi = FIELD_GET(PWM_HIGH_MASK, value); - if (channel->lo == 0) { - state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->hi); - state->duty_cycle = state->period; - } else if (channel->lo >= channel->hi) { - state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, - channel->lo + channel->hi); - state->duty_cycle = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, - channel->hi); - } else { - state->period = 0; - state->duty_cycle = 0; - } + state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->lo + channel->hi); + state->duty_cycle = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->hi); state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;