From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:38:20 +0000 (+0200) Subject: sched: Remove get_online_cpus() usage X-Git-Tag: v3.13-rc1~148^2~19 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6acce3ef84520537f8a09a12c9ddbe814a584dd2;p=kernel%2Fkernel-generic.git sched: Remove get_online_cpus() usage Remove get_online_cpus() usage from the scheduler; there's 4 sites that use it: - sched_init_smp(); where its completely superfluous since we're in 'early' boot and there simply cannot be any hotplugging. - sched_getaffinity(); we already take a raw spinlock to protect the task cpus_allowed mask, this disables preemption and therefore also stabilizes cpu_online_mask as that's modified using stop_machine. However switch to active mask for symmetry with sched_setaffinity()/set_cpus_allowed_ptr(). We guarantee active mask stability by inserting sync_rcu/sched() into _cpu_down. - sched_setaffinity(); we don't appear to need get_online_cpus() either, there's two sites where hotplug appears relevant: * cpuset_cpus_allowed(); for the !cpuset case we use possible_mask, for the cpuset case we hold task_lock, which is a spinlock and thus for mainline disables preemption (might cause pain on RT). * set_cpus_allowed_ptr(); Holds all scheduler locks and thus has preemption properly disabled; also it already deals with hotplug races explicitly where it releases them. - migrate_swap(); we can make stop_two_cpus() do the heavy lifting for us with a little trickery. By adding a sync_sched/rcu() after the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE notifier we can provide preempt/rcu guarantees for cpu_active_mask. Use these to validate that both our cpus are active when queueing the stop work before we queue the stop_machine works for take_cpu_down(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: Paul McKenney Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Oleg Nesterov Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131011123820.GV3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index d7f07a2..63aa50d 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -308,6 +308,23 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen) } smpboot_park_threads(cpu); + /* + * By now we've cleared cpu_active_mask, wait for all preempt-disabled + * and RCU users of this state to go away such that all new such users + * will observe it. + * + * For CONFIG_PREEMPT we have preemptible RCU and its sync_rcu() might + * not imply sync_sched(), so explicitly call both. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT + synchronize_sched(); +#endif + synchronize_rcu(); + + /* + * So now all preempt/rcu users must observe !cpu_active(). + */ + err = __stop_machine(take_cpu_down, &tcd_param, cpumask_of(cpu)); if (err) { /* CPU didn't die: tell everyone. Can't complain. */ diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index a972acd..c06b8d3 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1085,8 +1085,6 @@ int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *cur, struct task_struct *p) struct migration_swap_arg arg; int ret = -EINVAL; - get_online_cpus(); - arg = (struct migration_swap_arg){ .src_task = cur, .src_cpu = task_cpu(cur), @@ -1097,6 +1095,10 @@ int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *cur, struct task_struct *p) if (arg.src_cpu == arg.dst_cpu) goto out; + /* + * These three tests are all lockless; this is OK since all of them + * will be re-checked with proper locks held further down the line. + */ if (!cpu_active(arg.src_cpu) || !cpu_active(arg.dst_cpu)) goto out; @@ -1109,7 +1111,6 @@ int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *cur, struct task_struct *p) ret = stop_two_cpus(arg.dst_cpu, arg.src_cpu, migrate_swap_stop, &arg); out: - put_online_cpus(); return ret; } @@ -3710,7 +3711,6 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask) struct task_struct *p; int retval; - get_online_cpus(); rcu_read_lock(); p = find_process_by_pid(pid); @@ -3773,7 +3773,6 @@ out_free_cpus_allowed: free_cpumask_var(cpus_allowed); out_put_task: put_task_struct(p); - put_online_cpus(); return retval; } @@ -3818,7 +3817,6 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask) unsigned long flags; int retval; - get_online_cpus(); rcu_read_lock(); retval = -ESRCH; @@ -3831,12 +3829,11 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask) goto out_unlock; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); - cpumask_and(mask, &p->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_mask); + cpumask_and(mask, &p->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); out_unlock: rcu_read_unlock(); - put_online_cpus(); return retval; } @@ -6494,14 +6491,17 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void) sched_init_numa(); - get_online_cpus(); + /* + * There's no userspace yet to cause hotplug operations; hence all the + * cpu masks are stable and all blatant races in the below code cannot + * happen. + */ mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex); init_sched_domains(cpu_active_mask); cpumask_andnot(non_isolated_cpus, cpu_possible_mask, cpu_isolated_map); if (cpumask_empty(non_isolated_cpus)) cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), non_isolated_cpus); mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex); - put_online_cpus(); hotcpu_notifier(sched_domains_numa_masks_update, CPU_PRI_SCHED_ACTIVE); hotcpu_notifier(cpuset_cpu_active, CPU_PRI_CPUSET_ACTIVE); diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c index 32a6c44..c530bc5 100644 --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c @@ -234,11 +234,13 @@ static void irq_cpu_stop_queue_work(void *arg) */ int stop_two_cpus(unsigned int cpu1, unsigned int cpu2, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg) { - int call_cpu; struct cpu_stop_done done; struct cpu_stop_work work1, work2; struct irq_cpu_stop_queue_work_info call_args; - struct multi_stop_data msdata = { + struct multi_stop_data msdata; + + preempt_disable(); + msdata = (struct multi_stop_data){ .fn = fn, .data = arg, .num_threads = 2, @@ -262,16 +264,30 @@ int stop_two_cpus(unsigned int cpu1, unsigned int cpu2, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void * set_state(&msdata, MULTI_STOP_PREPARE); /* + * If we observe both CPUs active we know _cpu_down() cannot yet have + * queued its stop_machine works and therefore ours will get executed + * first. Or its not either one of our CPUs that's getting unplugged, + * in which case we don't care. + * + * This relies on the stopper workqueues to be FIFO. + */ + if (!cpu_active(cpu1) || !cpu_active(cpu2)) { + preempt_enable(); + return -ENOENT; + } + + /* * Queuing needs to be done by the lowest numbered CPU, to ensure * that works are always queued in the same order on every CPU. * This prevents deadlocks. */ - call_cpu = min(cpu1, cpu2); - - smp_call_function_single(call_cpu, &irq_cpu_stop_queue_work, + smp_call_function_single(min(cpu1, cpu2), + &irq_cpu_stop_queue_work, &call_args, 0); + preempt_enable(); wait_for_completion(&done.completion); + return done.executed ? done.ret : -ENOENT; }