From: Artem Belevich Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:37:06 +0000 (-0700) Subject: [CUDA, MemCpyOpt] Add a flag to force-enable memcpyopt and use it for CUDA. X-Git-Tag: upstream/15.0.7~34447 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6a9cf21f5a2dcd02f90075d6d3576a87f1abd8a9;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fllvm.git [CUDA, MemCpyOpt] Add a flag to force-enable memcpyopt and use it for CUDA. Attempt to enable MemCpyOpt unconditionally in D104801 uncovered the fact that there are users that do not expect LLVM to materialize `memset` intrinsic. While other passes can do that, too, MemCpyOpt triggers it more frequently and breaks sanitizers and some downstream users. For now introduce a flag to force-enable the flag and opt-in only CUDA compilation with NVPTX back-end. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106401 --- diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Cuda.cpp b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Cuda.cpp index c4d1ebd..37a4da80 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Cuda.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Cuda.cpp @@ -685,7 +685,8 @@ void CudaToolChain::addClangTargetOptions( "Only OpenMP or CUDA offloading kinds are supported for NVIDIA GPUs."); if (DeviceOffloadingKind == Action::OFK_Cuda) { - CC1Args.push_back("-fcuda-is-device"); + CC1Args.append( + {"-fcuda-is-device", "-mllvm", "-enable-memcpyopt-without-libcalls"}); if (DriverArgs.hasFlag(options::OPT_fcuda_approx_transcendentals, options::OPT_fno_cuda_approx_transcendentals, false)) diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MemCpyOptimizer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MemCpyOptimizer.cpp index 0dd0b45..42650f3 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MemCpyOptimizer.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MemCpyOptimizer.cpp @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ using namespace llvm; #define DEBUG_TYPE "memcpyopt" +static cl::opt EnableMemCpyOptWithoutLibcalls( + "enable-memcpyopt-without-libcalls", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden, + cl::desc("Enable memcpyopt even when libcalls are disabled")); + static cl::opt EnableMemorySSA("enable-memcpyopt-memoryssa", cl::init(true), cl::Hidden, cl::desc("Use MemorySSA-backed MemCpyOpt.")); @@ -677,8 +681,9 @@ bool MemCpyOptPass::processStore(StoreInst *SI, BasicBlock::iterator &BBI) { // the corresponding libcalls are not available. // TODO: We should really distinguish between libcall availability and // our ability to introduce intrinsics. - if (T->isAggregateType() && TLI->has(LibFunc_memcpy) && - TLI->has(LibFunc_memmove)) { + if (T->isAggregateType() && + (EnableMemCpyOptWithoutLibcalls || + (TLI->has(LibFunc_memcpy) && TLI->has(LibFunc_memmove)))) { MemoryLocation LoadLoc = MemoryLocation::get(LI); // We use alias analysis to check if an instruction may store to @@ -806,7 +811,7 @@ bool MemCpyOptPass::processStore(StoreInst *SI, BasicBlock::iterator &BBI) { // this if the corresponding libfunc is not available. // TODO: We should really distinguish between libcall availability and // our ability to introduce intrinsics. - if (!TLI->has(LibFunc_memset)) + if (!(TLI->has(LibFunc_memset) || EnableMemCpyOptWithoutLibcalls)) return false; // There are two cases that are interesting for this code to handle: memcpy diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/MemCpyOpt/no-libcalls.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/MemCpyOpt/no-libcalls.ll index c4d9351..ac7cfc5 100644 --- a/llvm/test/Transforms/MemCpyOpt/no-libcalls.ll +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/MemCpyOpt/no-libcalls.ll @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py ; RUN: opt -S -memcpyopt < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,LIBCALLS ; RUN: opt -S -memcpyopt -mtriple=amdgcn-- < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NO-LIBCALLS +; RUN: opt -S -memcpyopt -mtriple=amdgcn-- -enable-memcpyopt-without-libcalls < %s \ +; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,LIBCALLS ; REQUIRES: amdgpu-registered-target