From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:53:54 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: tsan: fix more bugs in signal handling
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6971414f3ebdc2a415c2582f69b5fe95c41aad32;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fllvm.git

tsan: fix more bugs in signal handling

llvm-svn: 168497
---

diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc b/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc
index 35aacdc..8be58d4 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc
+++ b/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc
@@ -165,13 +165,11 @@ ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() {
 struct BlockingCall {
   explicit BlockingCall(ThreadState *thr)
       : ctx(SigCtx(thr)) {
-    CHECK_EQ(ctx->in_blocking_func, 0);
     ctx->in_blocking_func++;
   }
 
   ~BlockingCall() {
     ctx->in_blocking_func--;
-    CHECK_EQ(ctx->in_blocking_func, 0);
   }
 
   SignalContext *ctx;
@@ -1231,7 +1229,7 @@ static void ALWAYS_INLINE rtl_generic_sighandler(bool sigact, int sig,
       // If we are in blocking function, we can safely process it now
       // (but check if we are in a recursive interceptor,
       // i.e. pthread_join()->munmap()).
-      (sctx && sctx->in_blocking_func && thr->in_rtl == 1)) {
+      (sctx && sctx->in_blocking_func == 1 && thr->in_rtl == 1)) {
     CHECK(thr->in_rtl == 0 || thr->in_rtl == 1);
     int in_rtl = thr->in_rtl;
     thr->in_rtl = 0;