From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:06:57 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash
X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~6538^2^2~2
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=68b99e94a4a2db6ba9b31fe0485e057b9354a640;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git

thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash

When CPU 0 is offline and intel_powerclamp is used to inject
idle, it generates kernel BUG:

BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: bash/15687
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
CPU: 4 PID: 15687 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7+ #57
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63
dump_stack+0x10/0x16
check_preemption_disabled+0xdd/0xe0
debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
powerclamp_set_cur_state+0x7f/0xf9 [intel_powerclamp]
...
...

Here CPU 0 is the control CPU by default and changed to the current CPU,
if CPU 0 offlined. This check has to be performed under cpus_read_lock(),
hence the above warning.

Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid this BUG.

Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
index c841ab3..46cd799 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -532,8 +532,10 @@ static int start_power_clamp(void)
 
 	/* prefer BSP */
 	control_cpu = 0;
-	if (!cpu_online(control_cpu))
-		control_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	if (!cpu_online(control_cpu)) {
+		control_cpu = get_cpu();
+		put_cpu();
+	}
 
 	clamping = true;
 	schedule_delayed_work(&poll_pkg_cstate_work, 0);