From: bwilson Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:14:14 +0000 (+0000) Subject: * gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c: xfail for xtensa. X-Git-Tag: upstream/4.9.2~72562 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=62e54054c64de1bf22fe2e58765b611dab5e76a4;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Flinaro-gcc.git * gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c: xfail for xtensa. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@78864 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 --- diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 42e02ae..0724e13 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2004-03-03 Bob Wilson + + * gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c: xfail for xtensa. + 2004-03-01 Mark Mitchell PR c++/14369 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c index 58c950d..b68abfc 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c99" } */ -/* This test fails on ARM cores because we use a block move to +/* This test fails on ARM and Xtensa cores because we use a block move to initialize "S" in test2, and GCC is not clever enough to eliminate the block move. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "L\\\$?C\[^A-Z\]" { xfail arm-*-* strongarm-*-* xscale-*-* powerpc*-*-aix* } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "L\\\$?C\[^A-Z\]" { xfail arm-*-* strongarm-*-* xscale-*-* powerpc*-*-aix* xtensa-*-* } } } */ #define I (__extension__ 1.0iF)