From: Ben Dooks Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:02:14 +0000 (+0000) Subject: DM9000: Ensure spinlock held whilst accessing EEPROM registers X-Git-Tag: v3.12-rc1~22667^2~61^2~38 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=621ddcb0461baee26a5e7c86a76938f0aa83dec1;p=kernel%2Fkernel-generic.git DM9000: Ensure spinlock held whilst accessing EEPROM registers Ensure we hold the spinlock whilst the registers and being modified even though we hold the overall lock. This should protect against an interrupt happening whilst we are using the device. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000.c b/drivers/net/dm9000.c index 3bef3b2..5a88371 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dm9000.c +++ b/drivers/net/dm9000.c @@ -1073,17 +1073,29 @@ dm9000_rx(struct net_device *dev) static void dm9000_read_eeprom(board_info_t *db, int offset, u8 *to) { + unsigned long flags; + mutex_lock(&db->addr_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock, flags); + iow(db, DM9000_EPAR, offset); iow(db, DM9000_EPCR, EPCR_ERPRR); + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock, flags); + mdelay(8); /* according to the datasheet 200us should be enough, but it doesn't work */ + + spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock, flags); + iow(db, DM9000_EPCR, 0x0); to[0] = ior(db, DM9000_EPDRL); to[1] = ior(db, DM9000_EPDRH); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&db->addr_lock); } @@ -1093,14 +1105,22 @@ dm9000_read_eeprom(board_info_t *db, int offset, u8 *to) static void dm9000_write_eeprom(board_info_t *db, int offset, u8 *data) { + unsigned long flags; + mutex_lock(&db->addr_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock, flags); iow(db, DM9000_EPAR, offset); iow(db, DM9000_EPDRH, data[1]); iow(db, DM9000_EPDRL, data[0]); iow(db, DM9000_EPCR, EPCR_WEP | EPCR_ERPRW); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock, flags); + mdelay(8); /* same shit */ + + spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock, flags); iow(db, DM9000_EPCR, 0); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock, flags); mutex_unlock(&db->addr_lock); }