From: Niklas Söderlund Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:04:24 +0000 (+0100) Subject: pinctrl: sh-pfc: Do not unconditionally support PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE X-Git-Tag: v4.10-rc1~168^2~24^2~8 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5d7400c4acbf7fe633a976a89ee845f7333de3e4;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git pinctrl: sh-pfc: Do not unconditionally support PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE Always stating PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE is supported gives untrue output when examining /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/e6060000.pfc/pinconf-pins if the operation get_bias() is implemented but the pin is not handled by the get_bias() implementation. In that case the output will state that "input bias disabled" indicating that this pin has bias control support. Make support for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE depend on that the pin either supports SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_PULL_UP or SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_PULL_DOWN. This also solves the issue where SoC specific implementations print error messages if their particular implementation of {set,get}_bias() is called with a pin it does not know about. Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven --- diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c index c577258..fcacfa7 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c @@ -570,7 +570,8 @@ static bool sh_pfc_pinconf_validate(struct sh_pfc *pfc, unsigned int _pin, switch (param) { case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE: - return true; + return pin->configs & + (SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_PULL_UP | SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_PULL_DOWN); case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP: return pin->configs & SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_PULL_UP;