From: Ben Hutchings Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:49:51 +0000 (-0700) Subject: hfsplus: refuse to mount volumes larger than 2TB X-Git-Tag: v2.6.32-rc6~89 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5c36fe3d87b3f0c85894a49193c66096a3d6b26f;p=profile%2Fivi%2Fkernel-adaptation-intel-automotive.git hfsplus: refuse to mount volumes larger than 2TB As found in , hfsplus is using type u32 rather than sector_t for some sector number calculations. In particular, hfsplus_get_block() does: u32 ablock, dblock, mask; ... map_bh(bh_result, sb, (dblock << HFSPLUS_SB(sb).fs_shift) + HFSPLUS_SB(sb).blockoffset + (iblock & mask)); I am not confident that I can find and fix all cases where a sector number may be truncated. For now, avoid data loss by refusing to mount HFS+ volumes with more than 2^32 sectors (2TB). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix 32 and 64-bit issues] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Cc: Eric Sesterhenn Cc: Roman Zippel Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c index 175d08e..bed78ac8 100644 --- a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c +++ b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ int hfsplus_read_wrapper(struct super_block *sb) if (hfsplus_get_last_session(sb, &part_start, &part_size)) return -EINVAL; + if ((u64)part_start + part_size > 0x100000000ULL) { + pr_err("hfs: volumes larger than 2TB are not supported yet\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } while (1) { bh = sb_bread512(sb, part_start + HFSPLUS_VOLHEAD_SECTOR, vhdr); if (!bh)