From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:43:38 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Since the word to byte register conversion isn't active for x86-64
X-Git-Tag: sid-snapshot-20120801~15
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5a819eb989d050f32a06af6c40e9b5eef4becabb;p=external%2Fbinutils.git

Since the word to byte register conversion isn't active for x86-64
anyway, there's also no need to issue a separate, inconsistent
diagnostic in some of the cases - non-matching operands will be
complained about anyway.

2012-07-31  Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

	* config/tc-i386.c (check_byte_reg): Check for I/O port
	register earlier, and just once. Drop diagnostic that got
	issued only for some registers.
---

diff --git a/gas/ChangeLog b/gas/ChangeLog
index 600871d..d474b3c 100644
--- a/gas/ChangeLog
+++ b/gas/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
 2012-07-31  Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
 
+	* config/tc-i386.c (check_byte_reg): Check for I/O port
+	register earlier, and just once. Drop diagnostic that got
+	issued only for some registers.
+
+2012-07-31  Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
+
 	* config/tc-i386.c (match_template): New local variable
 	'specific_error'. Set it from i.error after failed
 	check_VecOperands or VEX_check_operands. Use it if set in
diff --git a/gas/config/tc-i386.c b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
index b8c08e8..70f21db 100644
--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -4734,6 +4734,10 @@ check_byte_reg (void)
       if (i.types[op].bitfield.reg8)
 	continue;
 
+      /* I/O port address operands are OK too.  */
+      if (i.tm.operand_types[op].bitfield.inoutportreg)
+	continue;
+
       /* crc32 doesn't generate this warning.  */
       if (i.tm.base_opcode == 0xf20f38f0)
 	continue;
@@ -4741,21 +4745,13 @@ check_byte_reg (void)
       if ((i.types[op].bitfield.reg16
 	   || i.types[op].bitfield.reg32
 	   || i.types[op].bitfield.reg64)
-	  && i.op[op].regs->reg_num < 4)
+	  && i.op[op].regs->reg_num < 4
+	  /* Prohibit these changes in 64bit mode, since the lowering
+	     would be more complicated.  */
+	  && flag_code != CODE_64BIT)
 	{
-	  /* Prohibit these changes in the 64bit mode, since the
-	     lowering is more complicated.  */
-	  if (flag_code == CODE_64BIT
-	      && !i.tm.operand_types[op].bitfield.inoutportreg)
-	    {
-	      as_bad (_("incorrect register `%s%s' used with `%c' suffix"),
-		      register_prefix, i.op[op].regs->reg_name,
-		      i.suffix);
-	      return 0;
-	    }
 #if REGISTER_WARNINGS
-	  if (!quiet_warnings
-	      && !i.tm.operand_types[op].bitfield.inoutportreg)
+	  if (!quiet_warnings)
 	    as_warn (_("using `%s%s' instead of `%s%s' due to `%c' suffix"),
 		     register_prefix,
 		     (i.op[op].regs + (i.types[op].bitfield.reg16