From: Chad Versace Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:02:16 +0000 (-0800) Subject: intel: Fix bufmgr_gem->gen for gen > 4 X-Git-Tag: submit/1.0/20121108.012404~67 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=592ac67626f6d69bd8b518a33e80e9c4d223eba2;p=profile%2Fivi%2Flibdrm.git intel: Fix bufmgr_gem->gen for gen > 4 If the pci_device's actual gen was > 4, then we stupidly set bufmgr_gem->gen = 6. Luckily this caused no bugs, and this fix shouldn't change any behavior, because all checks against the gen currently have one of the forms below: gen == 2 gen == 3 gen >= 4 Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov Signed-off-by: Chad Versace --- diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c index 2b4fab1..26e3a5c 100644 --- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c +++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c @@ -2321,8 +2321,14 @@ drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(int fd, int batch_size) bufmgr_gem->gen = 3; else if (IS_GEN4(bufmgr_gem->pci_device)) bufmgr_gem->gen = 4; - else + else if (IS_GEN5(bufmgr_gem->pci_device)) + bufmgr_gem->gen = 5; + else if (IS_GEN6(bufmgr_gem->pci_device)) bufmgr_gem->gen = 6; + else if (IS_GEN7(bufmgr_gem->pci_device)) + bufmgr_gem->gen = 7; + else + assert(0); if (IS_GEN3(bufmgr_gem->pci_device) && bufmgr_gem->gtt_size > 256*1024*1024) {