From: Miaohe Lin Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 05:50:14 +0000 (+0800) Subject: mm: memory-failure: minor cleanup for comments and codestyle X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~1970^2~410 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5885c6a62533cbda19e9eceab619bde317de0c0d;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git mm: memory-failure: minor cleanup for comments and codestyle Fix some wrong function names and grammar error in comments. Also remove unneeded space after for_each_process. No functional change intended. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230711055016.2286677-7-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 44a0ce3..36529f3 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill, pgoff = page_to_pgoff(page); read_lock(&tasklist_lock); - for_each_process (tsk) { + for_each_process(tsk) { struct anon_vma_chain *vmac; struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early); @@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill, /* * Send early kill signal to tasks where a vma covers * the page but the corrupted page is not necessarily - * mapped it in its pte. + * mapped in its pte. * Assume applications who requested early kill want * to be informed of all such data corruptions. */ @@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(mf_mutex); * detected by a background scrubber) * * Must run in process context (e.g. a work queue) with interrupts - * enabled and no spinlocks hold. + * enabled and no spinlocks held. * * Return: 0 for successfully handled the memory error, * -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, @@ -2221,7 +2221,7 @@ try_again: * otherwise it may race with THP split. * And the flag can't be set in get_hwpoison_page() since * it is called by soft offline too and it is just called - * for !MF_COUNT_INCREASE. So here seems to be the best + * for !MF_COUNT_INCREASED. So here seems to be the best * place. * * Don't need care about the above error handling paths for @@ -2578,10 +2578,10 @@ static bool isolate_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist) /* * If we succeed to isolate the page, we grabbed another refcount on - * the page, so we can safely drop the one we got from get_any_pages(). + * the page, so we can safely drop the one we got from get_any_page(). * If we failed to isolate the page, it means that we cannot go further * and we will return an error, so drop the reference we got from - * get_any_pages() as well. + * get_any_page() as well. */ put_page(page); return isolated;