From: Wei Wang Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:28:58 +0000 (-0800) Subject: tcp: fix potential underestimation on rcv_rtt X-Git-Tag: v4.14.11~46 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=583395a81f00a42f178c1d8ba3c4858d76c9f5b4;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git tcp: fix potential underestimation on rcv_rtt [ Upstream commit 9ee11bd03cb1a5c3ca33c2bb70e7ed325f68890f ] When ms timestamp is used, current logic uses 1us in tcp_rcv_rtt_update() when the real rcv_rtt is within 1 - 999us. This could cause rcv_rtt underestimation. Fix it by always using a min value of 1ms if ms timestamp is used. Fixes: 645f4c6f2ebd ("tcp: switch rcv_rtt_est and rcvq_space to high resolution timestamps") Signed-off-by: Wei Wang Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Neal Cardwell Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index a965a38..ff48ac6 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -521,9 +521,6 @@ static void tcp_rcv_rtt_update(struct tcp_sock *tp, u32 sample, int win_dep) u32 new_sample = tp->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us; long m = sample; - if (m == 0) - m = 1; - if (new_sample != 0) { /* If we sample in larger samples in the non-timestamp * case, we could grossly overestimate the RTT especially @@ -560,6 +557,8 @@ static inline void tcp_rcv_rtt_measure(struct tcp_sock *tp) if (before(tp->rcv_nxt, tp->rcv_rtt_est.seq)) return; delta_us = tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, tp->rcv_rtt_est.time); + if (!delta_us) + delta_us = 1; tcp_rcv_rtt_update(tp, delta_us, 1); new_measure: @@ -576,8 +575,11 @@ static inline void tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts(struct sock *sk, (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq >= inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ack.rcv_mss)) { u32 delta = tcp_time_stamp(tp) - tp->rx_opt.rcv_tsecr; - u32 delta_us = delta * (USEC_PER_SEC / TCP_TS_HZ); + u32 delta_us; + if (!delta) + delta = 1; + delta_us = delta * (USEC_PER_SEC / TCP_TS_HZ); tcp_rcv_rtt_update(tp, delta_us, 0); } }