From: Zhang Yi Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 13:34:59 +0000 (+0800) Subject: ocfs2: replace ll_rw_block() X-Git-Tag: v6.1-rc5~170^2~467 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=54d9171d38d904f5afde76e51bed416aaf144975;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git ocfs2: replace ll_rw_block() ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ocfs2. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901133505.2510834-9-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c index af4157f..1d65f6e 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ int ocfs2_map_page_blocks(struct page *page, u64 *p_blkno, !buffer_new(bh) && ocfs2_should_read_blk(inode, page, block_start) && (block_start < from || block_end > to)) { - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); + bh_read_nowait(bh, 0); *wait_bh++=bh; } diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c index e2cc9ee..26b4c2b 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c @@ -1764,9 +1764,7 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb, if (!buffer_dirty(*bh)) clear_buffer_uptodate(*bh); unlock_buffer(*bh); - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, bh); - wait_on_buffer(*bh); - if (!buffer_uptodate(*bh)) { + if (bh_read(*bh, 0) < 0) { mlog_errno(-EIO); brelse(*bh); *bh = NULL;