From: Imre Deak Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:10:36 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it X-Git-Tag: v4.14-rc1~2738^2~45^2~939 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=542db3cd345c38936bb9e4bb2c8d1971e6ac6619;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it With this change we have the corresponding wake lock checks in both the rpm get and put functions. v2-v3: - unchanged v4: - keep the corresponding check in the get helper (Chris) v5: - add a note to the commit message that with this change we have the checks both in the rpm get and put functions (Joonas) Signed-off-by: Imre Deak Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1450203038-5150-9-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c index df9a3f1..4c80d2a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c @@ -2286,6 +2286,7 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev; struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev; + assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv); atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count); pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(device);