From: julie Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0000 (+0000) Subject: While looking if bug0022 was corrected, found that some comments were not updated X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/5.0/unified/20181102.024111~818 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=53b71f5605f83d116ab6bcf477bfb6d2ca757de1;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Flapack.git While looking if bug0022 was corrected, found that some comments were not updated bug0022 was indeed corrected by Zlatko --- diff --git a/SRC/dgejsv.f b/SRC/dgejsv.f index e61b27a..fee34dd 100644 --- a/SRC/dgejsv.f +++ b/SRC/dgejsv.f @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ * If JOBV = 'V' or 'J' or 'W', then LDV >= N. * * WORK (workspace/output) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension at least LWORK. -* On exit, +* On exit, if N.GT.0 .AND. M.GT.0 (else not referenced), * WORK(1) = SCALE = WORK(2) / WORK(1) is the scaling factor such * that SCALE*SVA(1:N) are the computed singular values * of A. (See the description of SVA().) @@ -252,33 +252,50 @@ * LWORK depends on the job: * * If only SIGMA is needed ( JOBU.EQ.'N', JOBV.EQ.'N' ) and -* -> .. no scaled condition estimate required ( JOBE.EQ.'N'): +* -> .. no scaled condition estimate required (JOBE.EQ.'N'): * LWORK >= max(2*M+N,4*N+1,7). This is the minimal requirement. -* For optimal performance (blocked code) the optimal value +* ->> For optimal performance (blocked code) the optimal value * is LWORK >= max(2*M+N,3*N+(N+1)*NB,7). Here NB is the optimal -* block size for xGEQP3/xGEQRF. +* block size for DGEQP3 and DGEQRF. +* In general, optimal LWORK is computed as +* LWORK >= max(2*M+N,N+LWORK(DGEQP3),N+LWORK(DGEQRF), 7). * -> .. an estimate of the scaled condition number of A is * required (JOBA='E', 'G'). In this case, LWORK is the maximum -* of the above and N*N+4*N, i.e. LWORK >= max(2*M+N,N*N+4N,7). +* of the above and N*N+4*N, i.e. LWORK >= max(2*M+N,N*N+4*N,7). +* ->> For optimal performance (blocked code) the optimal value +* is LWORK >= max(2*M+N,3*N+(N+1)*NB, N*N+4*N, 7). +* In general, the optimal length LWORK is computed as +* LWORK >= max(2*M+N,N+LWORK(DGEQP3),N+LWORK(DGEQRF), +* N+N*N+LWORK(DPOCON),7). * * If SIGMA and the right singular vectors are needed (JOBV.EQ.'V'), -* -> the minimal requirement is LWORK >= max(2*N+M,7). -* -> For optimal performance, LWORK >= max(2*N+M,2*N+N*NB,7), -* where NB is the optimal block size. +* -> the minimal requirement is LWORK >= max(2*M+N,4*N+1,7). +* -> For optimal performance, LWORK >= max(2*M+N,3*N+(N+1)*NB,7), +* where NB is the optimal block size for DGEQP3, DGEQRF, DGELQ, +* DORMLQ. In general, the optimal length LWORK is computed as +* LWORK >= max(2*M+N,N+LWORK(DGEQP3), N+LWORK(DPOCON), +* N+LWORK(DGELQ), 2*N+LWORK(DGEQRF), N+LWORK(DORMLQ)). * * If SIGMA and the left singular vectors are needed -* -> the minimal requirement is LWORK >= max(2*N+M,7). -* -> For optimal performance, LWORK >= max(2*N+M,2*N+N*NB,7), -* where NB is the optimal block size. -* -* If full SVD is needed ( JOBU.EQ.'U' or 'F', JOBV.EQ.'V' ) and -* -> .. the singular vectors are computed without explicit -* accumulation of the Jacobi rotations, LWORK >= 6*N+2*N*N -* -> .. in the iterative part, the Jacobi rotations are -* explicitly accumulated (option, see the description of JOBV), -* then the minimal requirement is LWORK >= max(M+3*N+N*N,7). -* For better performance, if NB is the optimal block size, -* LWORK >= max(3*N+N*N+M,3*N+N*N+N*NB,7). +* -> the minimal requirement is LWORK >= max(2*M+N,4*N+1,7). +* -> For optimal performance: +* if JOBU.EQ.'U' :: LWORK >= max(2*M+N,3*N+(N+1)*NB,7), +* if JOBU.EQ.'F' :: LWORK >= max(2*M+N,3*N+(N+1)*NB,N+M*NB,7), +* where NB is the optimal block size for DGEQP3, DGEQRF, DORMQR. +* In general, the optimal length LWORK is computed as +* LWORK >= max(2*M+N,N+LWORK(DGEQP3),N+LWORK(DPOCON), +* 2*N+LWORK(DGEQRF), N+LWORK(DORMQR)). +* Here LWORK(DORMQR) equals N*NB (for JOBU.EQ.'U') or +* M*NB (for JOBU.EQ.'F'). +* +* If the full SVD is needed: (JOBU.EQ.'U' or JOBU.EQ.'F') and +* -> if JOBV.EQ.'V' +* the minimal requirement is LWORK >= max(2*M+N,6*N+2*N*N). +* -> if JOBV.EQ.'J' the minimal requirement is +* LWORK >= max(2*M+N, 4*N+N*N,2*N+N*N+6). +* -> For optimal performance, LWORK should be additionally +* larger than N+M*NB, where NB is the optimal block size +* for DORMQR. * * IWORK (workspace/output) INTEGER array, dimension M+3*N. * On exit, @@ -300,8 +317,8 @@ * Further Details * =============== * -* DGEJSV implements a preconditioned Jacobi SVD algorithm. It uses SGEQP3, -* SGEQRF, and SGELQF as preprocessors and preconditioners. Optionally, an +* DGEJSV implements a preconditioned Jacobi SVD algorithm. It uses DGEQP3, +* DGEQRF, and DGELQF as preprocessors and preconditioners. Optionally, an * additional row pivoting can be used as a preprocessor, which in some * cases results in much higher accuracy. An example is matrix A with the * structure A = D1 * C * D2, where D1, D2 are arbitrarily ill-conditioned @@ -319,14 +336,14 @@ * the singular values in the range of normalized IEEE numbers is that the * spectral condition number kappa(A)=sigma_max(A)/sigma_min(A) does not * overflow. This code (DGEJSV) is best used in this restricted range, -* meaning that singular values of magnitude below ||A||_2 / SLAMCH('O') are +* meaning that singular values of magnitude below ||A||_2 / DLAMCH('O') are * returned as zeros. See JOBR for details on this. * Further, this implementation is somewhat slower than the one described * in [1,2] due to replacement of some non-LAPACK components, and because * the choice of some tuning parameters in the iterative part (DGESVJ) is * left to the implementer on a particular machine. -* The rank revealing QR factorization (in this code: SGEQP3) should be -* implemented as in [3]. We have a new version of SGEQP3 under development +* The rank revealing QR factorization (in this code: DGEQP3) should be +* implemented as in [3]. We have a new version of DGEQP3 under development * that is more robust than the current one in LAPACK, with a cleaner cut in * rank defficient cases. It will be available in the SIGMA library [4]. * If M is much larger than N, it is obvious that the inital QRF with @@ -437,14 +454,18 @@ ELSE IF ( RSVEC .AND. ( LDV .LT. N ) ) THEN INFO = - 14 ELSE IF ( (.NOT.(LSVEC .OR. RSVEC .OR. ERREST).AND. - $ (LWORK .LT. MAX0(7,4*N+1,2*M+N))) .OR. - $ (.NOT.(LSVEC .OR. LSVEC) .AND. ERREST .AND. - $ (LWORK .LT. MAX0(7,4*N+N*N,2*M+N))) .OR. - $ (LSVEC .AND. (.NOT.RSVEC) .AND. (LWORK .LT. MAX0(7,2*N+M))) .OR. - $ (RSVEC .AND. (.NOT.LSVEC) .AND. (LWORK .LT. MAX0(7,2*N+M))) .OR. - $ (LSVEC .AND. RSVEC .AND. .NOT.JRACC .AND. (LWORK.LT.6*N+2*N*N)) - $ .OR. (LSVEC.AND.RSVEC.AND.JRACC.AND.LWORK.LT.MAX0(7,M+3*N+N*N))) - $ THEN + & (LWORK .LT. MAX0(7,4*N+1,2*M+N))) .OR. + & (.NOT.(LSVEC .OR. RSVEC) .AND. ERREST .AND. + & (LWORK .LT. MAX0(7,4*N+N*N,2*M+N))) .OR. + & (LSVEC .AND. (.NOT.RSVEC) .AND. (LWORK .LT. MAX0(7,2*M+N,4*N+1))) + & .OR. + & (RSVEC .AND. (.NOT.LSVEC) .AND. (LWORK .LT. MAX0(7,2*M+N,4*N+1))) + & .OR. + & (LSVEC .AND. RSVEC .AND. (.NOT.JRACC) .AND. + & (LWORK.LT.MAX0(2*M+N,6*N+2*N*N))) + & .OR. (LSVEC .AND. RSVEC .AND. JRACC .AND. + & LWORK.LT.MAX0(2*M+N,4*N+N*N,2*N+N*N+6))) + & THEN INFO = - 17 ELSE * #:) @@ -454,6 +475,7 @@ IF ( INFO .NE. 0 ) THEN * #:( CALL XERBLA( 'DGEJSV', - INFO ) + RETURN END IF * * Quick return for void matrix (Y3K safe) @@ -471,7 +493,6 @@ * *! NOTE: Make sure DLAMCH() does not fail on the target architecture. * - EPSLN = DLAMCH('Epsilon') SFMIN = DLAMCH('SafeMinimum') SMALL = SFMIN / EPSLN @@ -536,6 +557,7 @@ END IF IWORK(1) = 0 IWORK(2) = 0 + IWORK(3) = 0 RETURN END IF * @@ -916,7 +938,6 @@ * * Phase 3: * - IF ( .NOT. ( RSVEC .OR. LSVEC ) ) THEN * * Singular Values only diff --git a/SRC/dgsvj1.f b/SRC/dgsvj1.f index e9a3494..ae4f8bf 100644 --- a/SRC/dgsvj1.f +++ b/SRC/dgsvj1.f @@ -44,12 +44,12 @@ * block-entries (tiles) of the (1,2) off-diagonal block are marked by the * [x]'s in the following scheme: * -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cycling in the nblr-by-nblc [x] blocks. -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cyclic pivoting inside each [x] block. -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cycling in the nblr-by-nblc [x] blocks. +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cyclic pivoting inside each [x] block. +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | * * In terms of the columns of A, the first N1 columns are rotated 'against' * the remaining N-N1 columns, trying to increase the angle between the @@ -271,12 +271,12 @@ * Jacobi SVD algorithm SGESVJ. * * -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cycling in the nblr-by-nblc [x] blocks. -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cyclic pivoting inside each [x] block. -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cycling in the nblr-by-nblc [x] blocks. +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cyclic pivoting inside each [x] block. +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | * * DO 1993 i = 1, NSWEEP diff --git a/SRC/sgsvj1.f b/SRC/sgsvj1.f index bb36ea1..c1249b7 100644 --- a/SRC/sgsvj1.f +++ b/SRC/sgsvj1.f @@ -44,12 +44,12 @@ * block-entries (tiles) of the (1,2) off-diagonal block are marked by the * [x]'s in the following scheme: * -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cycling in the nblr-by-nblc [x] blocks. -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cyclic pivoting inside each [x] block. -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cycling in the nblr-by-nblc [x] blocks. +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cyclic pivoting inside each [x] block. +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | * * In terms of the columns of A, the first N1 columns are rotated 'against' * the remaining N-N1 columns, trying to increase the angle between the @@ -271,12 +271,12 @@ * Jacobi SVD algorithm SGESVJ. * * -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cycling in the nblr-by-nblc [x] blocks. -* | * C * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cyclic pivoting inside each [x] block. -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | -* |[x] [x] [x] * C * | +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cycling in the nblr-by-nblc [x] blocks. +* | * * * [x] [x] [x]| Row-cyclic pivoting inside each [x] block. +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | +* |[x] [x] [x] * * * | * * DO 1993 i = 1, NSWEEP