From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:43:17 +0000 (+0200) Subject: bpf: Add lockdown check for probe_write_user helper X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/unified/20230118.172025~6675^2~14^2~3 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=51e1bb9eeaf7868db56e58f47848e364ab4c4129;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git bpf: Add lockdown check for probe_write_user helper Back then, commit 96ae52279594 ("bpf: Add bpf_probe_write_user BPF helper to be called in tracers") added the bpf_probe_write_user() helper in order to allow to override user space memory. Its original goal was to have a facility to "debug, divert, and manipulate execution of semi-cooperative processes" under CAP_SYS_ADMIN. Write to kernel was explicitly disallowed since it would otherwise tamper with its integrity. One use case was shown in cf9b1199de27 ("samples/bpf: Add test/example of using bpf_probe_write_user bpf helper") where the program DNATs traffic at the time of connect(2) syscall, meaning, it rewrites the arguments to a syscall while they're still in userspace, and before the syscall has a chance to copy the argument into kernel space. These days we have better mechanisms in BPF for achieving the same (e.g. for load-balancers), but without having to write to userspace memory. Of course the bpf_probe_write_user() helper can also be used to abuse many other things for both good or bad purpose. Outside of BPF, there is a similar mechanism for ptrace(2) such as PTRACE_PEEK{TEXT,DATA} and PTRACE_POKE{TEXT,DATA}, but would likely require some more effort. Commit 96ae52279594 explicitly dedicated the helper for experimentation purpose only. Thus, move the helper's availability behind a newly added LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER lockdown knob so that the helper is disabled under the "integrity" mode. More fine-grained control can be implemented also from LSM side with this change. Fixes: 96ae52279594 ("bpf: Add bpf_probe_write_user BPF helper to be called in tracers") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko --- diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 724d7a4..5b72885 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ enum lockdown_reason { LOCKDOWN_MMIOTRACE, LOCKDOWN_DEBUGFS, LOCKDOWN_XMON_WR, + LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER, LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX, LOCKDOWN_KCORE, LOCKDOWN_KPROBES, diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 1836591..fdd1407 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -990,12 +990,13 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) return &bpf_get_numa_node_id_proto; case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read: return &bpf_perf_event_read_proto; - case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user: - return bpf_get_probe_write_proto(); case BPF_FUNC_current_task_under_cgroup: return &bpf_current_task_under_cgroup_proto; case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32: return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto; + case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user: + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER) < 0 ? + NULL : bpf_get_probe_write_proto(); case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user: return &bpf_probe_read_user_proto; case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel: diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index 6b83ab4..9ffa9e9 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ const char *const lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1] = { [LOCKDOWN_MMIOTRACE] = "unsafe mmio", [LOCKDOWN_DEBUGFS] = "debugfs access", [LOCKDOWN_XMON_WR] = "xmon write access", + [LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER] = "use of bpf to write user RAM", [LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX] = "integrity", [LOCKDOWN_KCORE] = "/proc/kcore access", [LOCKDOWN_KPROBES] = "use of kprobes",