From: Minghao Chi Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:26:54 +0000 (+0100) Subject: nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync X-Git-Tag: v6.1-rc5~1160^2~88 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=517f6e2641a2802dce5a5aa0d18c7d37a35678d2;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code Reported-by: Zeal Robot Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429162701.2222-10-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c index 162132c..c1e893c 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c @@ -217,9 +217,8 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv, goto err_clk_rate_set; } - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(priv->dev); if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->dev); dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable power-domain\n"); goto err_reg_enable; }