From: Cong Wang Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:51:19 +0000 (-0800) Subject: kcm: close race conditions on sk_receive_queue X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~6176^2~15 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5121197ecc5db58c07da95eb1ff82b98b121a221;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git kcm: close race conditions on sk_receive_queue sk->sk_receive_queue is protected by skb queue lock, but for KCM sockets its RX path takes mux->rx_lock to protect more than just skb queue. However, kcm_recvmsg() still only grabs the skb queue lock, so race conditions still exist. We can teach kcm_recvmsg() to grab mux->rx_lock too but this would introduce a potential performance regression as struct kcm_mux can be shared by multiple KCM sockets. So we have to enforce skb queue lock in requeue_rx_msgs() and handle skb peek case carefully in kcm_wait_data(). Fortunately, skb_recv_datagram() already handles it nicely and is widely used by other sockets, we can just switch to skb_recv_datagram() after getting rid of the unnecessary sock lock in kcm_recvmsg() and kcm_splice_read(). Side note: SOCK_DONE is not used by KCM sockets, so it is safe to get rid of this check too. I ran the original syzbot reproducer for 30 min without seeing any issue. Fixes: ab7ac4eb9832 ("kcm: Kernel Connection Multiplexor module") Reported-by: syzbot+278279efdd2730dd14bf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: shaozhengchao Cc: Paolo Abeni Cc: Tom Herbert Signed-off-by: Cong Wang Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114005119.597905-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni --- diff --git a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c index a500422..890a242 100644 --- a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c +++ b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static void requeue_rx_msgs(struct kcm_mux *mux, struct sk_buff_head *head) struct sk_buff *skb; struct kcm_sock *kcm; - while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(head))) { + while ((skb = skb_dequeue(head))) { /* Reset destructor to avoid calling kcm_rcv_ready */ skb->destructor = sock_rfree; skb_orphan(skb); @@ -1085,53 +1085,17 @@ out_error: return err; } -static struct sk_buff *kcm_wait_data(struct sock *sk, int flags, - long timeo, int *err) -{ - struct sk_buff *skb; - - while (!(skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue))) { - if (sk->sk_err) { - *err = sock_error(sk); - return NULL; - } - - if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE)) - return NULL; - - if ((flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) || !timeo) { - *err = -EAGAIN; - return NULL; - } - - sk_wait_data(sk, &timeo, NULL); - - /* Handle signals */ - if (signal_pending(current)) { - *err = sock_intr_errno(timeo); - return NULL; - } - } - - return skb; -} - static int kcm_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, int flags) { struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct kcm_sock *kcm = kcm_sk(sk); int err = 0; - long timeo; struct strp_msg *stm; int copied = 0; struct sk_buff *skb; - timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT); - - lock_sock(sk); - - skb = kcm_wait_data(sk, flags, timeo, &err); + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err); if (!skb) goto out; @@ -1162,14 +1126,11 @@ msg_finished: /* Finished with message */ msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR; KCM_STATS_INCR(kcm->stats.rx_msgs); - skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue); - kfree_skb(skb); } } out: - release_sock(sk); - + skb_free_datagram(sk, skb); return copied ? : err; } @@ -1179,7 +1140,6 @@ static ssize_t kcm_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos, { struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct kcm_sock *kcm = kcm_sk(sk); - long timeo; struct strp_msg *stm; int err = 0; ssize_t copied; @@ -1187,11 +1147,7 @@ static ssize_t kcm_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos, /* Only support splice for SOCKSEQPACKET */ - timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT); - - lock_sock(sk); - - skb = kcm_wait_data(sk, flags, timeo, &err); + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err); if (!skb) goto err_out; @@ -1219,13 +1175,11 @@ static ssize_t kcm_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos, * finish reading the message. */ - release_sock(sk); - + skb_free_datagram(sk, skb); return copied; err_out: - release_sock(sk); - + skb_free_datagram(sk, skb); return err; }