From: Denys Vlasenko Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:48:55 +0000 (+0200) Subject: 3c59x: Fix shared IRQ handling X-Git-Tag: v4.2-rc3~33^2~19 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4eed4d8ff984abcb983ada5b3dbf56fce35f1068;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git 3c59x: Fix shared IRQ handling As its first order of business, boomerang_interrupt() checks whether the device really has any pending interrupts. If it does not, it does nothing and returns, but it still returns IRQ_HANDLED. This is wrong: interrupt was not handled, IRQ handlers of other devices sharing this IRQ line need to be called. vortex_interrupt() has it right: it returns IRQ_NONE in this case via IRQ_RETVAL(0). Do the same in boomerang_interrupt(). Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko CC: David S. Miller CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c index 41095eb..2d1ce3c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c @@ -2382,6 +2382,7 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) void __iomem *ioaddr; int status; int work_done = max_interrupt_work; + int handled = 0; ioaddr = vp->ioaddr; @@ -2400,6 +2401,7 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) if ((status & IntLatch) == 0) goto handler_exit; /* No interrupt: shared IRQs can cause this */ + handled = 1; if (status == 0xffff) { /* h/w no longer present (hotplug)? */ if (vortex_debug > 1) @@ -2501,7 +2503,7 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) handler_exit: vp->handling_irq = 0; spin_unlock(&vp->lock); - return IRQ_HANDLED; + return IRQ_RETVAL(handled); } static int vortex_rx(struct net_device *dev)