From: Filipe Manana Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:13:48 +0000 (+0000) Subject: btrfs: simplify variables in btrfs_block_rsv_refill() X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~2632^2~104 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4e8313e53c83d11510b9f323861a6f83757529ed;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git btrfs: simplify variables in btrfs_block_rsv_refill() At btrfs_block_rsv_refill(), there's no point in initializing the 'num_bytes' variable to 0 and then, after taking the block reserve's spinlock, initializing it to the value of the 'min_reserved' parameter. So just get rid of the 'num_bytes' local variable and rename the 'min_reserved' parameter to 'num_bytes'. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c index 364a3d1..90b8088 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c @@ -242,17 +242,15 @@ int btrfs_block_rsv_check(struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, int min_percent) } int btrfs_block_rsv_refill(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, - struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 min_reserved, + struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 num_bytes, enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush) { - u64 num_bytes = 0; int ret = -ENOSPC; if (!block_rsv) return 0; spin_lock(&block_rsv->lock); - num_bytes = min_reserved; if (block_rsv->reserved >= num_bytes) ret = 0; else diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h index 4cc41c9..6dc7817 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ int btrfs_block_rsv_add(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush); int btrfs_block_rsv_check(struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, int min_percent); int btrfs_block_rsv_refill(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, - struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 min_reserved, + struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 num_bytes, enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush); int btrfs_block_rsv_migrate(struct btrfs_block_rsv *src_rsv, struct btrfs_block_rsv *dst_rsv, u64 num_bytes,