From: Masami Hiramatsu Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:13:42 +0000 (+0900) Subject: bootconfig: Prohibit re-defining value on same key X-Git-Tag: v5.10.7~3087^2~3 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4e4694d8729f7cd6381f6691e8f83e378fce3160;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git bootconfig: Prohibit re-defining value on same key Currently, bootconfig adds a new value on the existing key to the tail of an array. But this looks a bit confusing because an admin can easily rewrite the original value in the same config file. This rejects the following value re-definition. key = value1 ... key = value2 You should rewrite value1 to value2 in this case. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/158227282199.12842.10110929876059658601.stgit@devnote2 Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu [ Fixed spelling of arraies to arrays ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst index dfeffa7..57119fb 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst @@ -62,7 +62,16 @@ Or more shorter, written as following:: In both styles, same key words are automatically merged when parsing it at boot time. So you can append similar trees or key-values. -Note that a sub-key and a value can not co-exist under a parent key. +Same-key Values +--------------- + +It is prohibited that two or more values or arrays share a same-key. +For example,:: + + foo = bar, baz + foo = qux # !ERROR! we can not re-define same key + +Also, a sub-key and a value can not co-exist under a parent key. For example, following config is NOT allowed.:: foo = value1 diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c index 54ac623..2ef304d 100644 --- a/lib/bootconfig.c +++ b/lib/bootconfig.c @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static int __init __xbc_parse_keys(char *k) static int __init xbc_parse_kv(char **k, char *v) { struct xbc_node *prev_parent = last_parent; - struct xbc_node *node, *child; + struct xbc_node *child; char *next; int c, ret; @@ -590,15 +590,18 @@ static int __init xbc_parse_kv(char **k, char *v) return ret; child = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent); - if (child && xbc_node_is_key(child)) - return xbc_parse_error("Value is mixed with subkey", v); + if (child) { + if (xbc_node_is_key(child)) + return xbc_parse_error("Value is mixed with subkey", v); + else + return xbc_parse_error("Value is redefined", v); + } c = __xbc_parse_value(&v, &next); if (c < 0) return c; - node = xbc_add_sibling(v, XBC_VALUE); - if (!node) + if (!xbc_add_sibling(v, XBC_VALUE)) return -ENOMEM; if (c == ',') { /* Array */ diff --git a/tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-samekey.bconf b/tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-samekey.bconf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e8d983a --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-samekey.bconf @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +# Same key value is not allowed +key { + foo = value + bar = value2 +} +key.foo = value