From: Markus Metzger Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:05:38 +0000 (+0200) Subject: btrace: allow full memory and register access for non-replaying threads X-Git-Tag: users/ARM/embedded-binutils-2_26-branch-2016q1~649 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4d10e986f499f330963c4641fd91046c57c94bd8;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fbinutils.git btrace: allow full memory and register access for non-replaying threads The record btrace target does not allow accessing memory and storing registers while replaying. For multi-threaded applications, this prevents those accesses also for threads that are at the end of their execution history as long as at least one thread is replaying. Change this to only check if the selected thread is replaying. This allows threads that are at the end of their execution history to read and write memory and to store registers. Also change the error message to reflect this change. gdb/ * record-btrace.c (record_btrace_xfer_partial) (record_btrace_store_registers, record_btrace_prepare_to_store): Call record_btrace_is_replaying with inferior_ptid instead of minus_one_ptid. (record_btrace_store_registers): Change error message. --- diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index db5386e..1c4922f 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,13 @@ 2015-09-18 Markus Metzger + * record-btrace.c (record_btrace_xfer_partial) + (record_btrace_store_registers, record_btrace_prepare_to_store): + Call record_btrace_is_replaying with inferior_ptid instead of + minus_one_ptid. + (record_btrace_store_registers): Change error message. + +2015-09-18 Markus Metzger + * record-btrace.c (record_btrace_is_replaying): Add ptid argument. Update users to pass minus_one_ptid. * record-full.c (record_full_is_replaying): Add ptid argument (ignored). diff --git a/gdb/record-btrace.c b/gdb/record-btrace.c index 481d22d..b4e4560 100644 --- a/gdb/record-btrace.c +++ b/gdb/record-btrace.c @@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ record_btrace_xfer_partial (struct target_ops *ops, enum target_object object, /* Filter out requests that don't make sense during replay. */ if (replay_memory_access == replay_memory_access_read_only && !record_btrace_generating_corefile - && record_btrace_is_replaying (ops, minus_one_ptid)) + && record_btrace_is_replaying (ops, inferior_ptid)) { switch (object) { @@ -1314,8 +1314,8 @@ record_btrace_store_registers (struct target_ops *ops, struct target_ops *t; if (!record_btrace_generating_corefile - && record_btrace_is_replaying (ops, minus_one_ptid)) - error (_("This record target does not allow writing registers.")); + && record_btrace_is_replaying (ops, inferior_ptid)) + error (_("Cannot write registers while replaying.")); gdb_assert (may_write_registers != 0); @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ record_btrace_prepare_to_store (struct target_ops *ops, struct target_ops *t; if (!record_btrace_generating_corefile - && record_btrace_is_replaying (ops, minus_one_ptid)) + && record_btrace_is_replaying (ops, inferior_ptid)) return; t = ops->beneath;