From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 00:30:54 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: btrfs: tree-checker: Check if the file extent end overflows
X-Git-Tag: v5.4-rc1~213^2~105
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4c094c33c9ed4b8d0d814bd1d7ff78e123d15d00;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git

btrfs: tree-checker: Check if the file extent end overflows

Under certain conditions, we could have strange file extent item in log
tree like:

  item 18 key (69599 108 397312) itemoff 15208 itemsize 53
	extent data disk bytenr 0 nr 0
	extent data offset 0 nr 18446744073709547520 ram 18446744073709547520

The num_bytes + ram_bytes overflow 64 bit type.

For num_bytes part, we can detect such overflow along with file offset
(key->offset), as file_offset + num_bytes should never go beyond u64.

For ram_bytes part, it's about the decompressed size of the extent, not
directly related to the size.
In theory it is OK to have a large value, and put extra limitation
on RAM bytes may cause unexpected false alerts.

So in tree-checker, we only check if the file offset and num bytes
overflow.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 96fce4b..ccd57061 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static int check_extent_data_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 	struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
 	u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize;
 	u32 item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);
+	u64 extent_end;
 
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(key->offset, sectorsize)) {
 		file_extent_err(leaf, slot,
@@ -207,6 +208,16 @@ static int check_extent_data_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 	    CHECK_FE_ALIGNED(leaf, slot, fi, num_bytes, sectorsize))
 		return -EUCLEAN;
 
+	/* Catch extent end overflow */
+	if (check_add_overflow(btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(leaf, fi),
+			       key->offset, &extent_end)) {
+		file_extent_err(leaf, slot,
+	"extent end overflow, have file offset %llu extent num bytes %llu",
+				key->offset,
+				btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(leaf, fi));
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Check that no two consecutive file extent items, in the same leaf,
 	 * present ranges that overlap each other.