From: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 07:14:45 +0000 (+0100) Subject: libatomic: Handle AVX+CX16 AMD like Intel for 16b atomics [PR104688] X-Git-Tag: upstream/13.1.0~3196 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4a7a846687e076eae58ad3ea959245b2bf7fdc07;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fgcc.git libatomic: Handle AVX+CX16 AMD like Intel for 16b atomics [PR104688] We got a response from AMD in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688#c10 so the following patch starts treating AMD with AVX and CMPXCHG16B ISAs like Intel by using vmovdqa for atomic load/store in libatomic. We still don't have confirmation from Zhaoxin and VIA (anything else with CPUs featuring AVX and CX16?). 2022-11-15 Jakub Jelinek PR target/104688 * config/x86/init.c (__libat_feat1_init): Don't clear bit_AVX on AMD CPUs. --- diff --git a/libatomic/config/x86/init.c b/libatomic/config/x86/init.c index 6f6499c..10e1c5f 100644 --- a/libatomic/config/x86/init.c +++ b/libatomic/config/x86/init.c @@ -39,10 +39,12 @@ __libat_feat1_init (void) == (bit_AVX | bit_CMPXCHG16B)) { /* Intel SDM guarantees that 16-byte VMOVDQA on 16-byte aligned address - is atomic, but so far we don't have this guarantee from AMD. */ + is atomic, and AMD is going to do something similar soon. + We don't have a guarantee from vendors of other CPUs with AVX, + like Zhaoxin and VIA. */ unsigned int ecx2 = 0; __get_cpuid (0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx2, &edx); - if (ecx2 != signature_INTEL_ecx) + if (ecx2 != signature_INTEL_ecx && ecx2 != signature_AMD_ecx) FEAT1_REGISTER &= ~bit_AVX; } #endif