From: Steffen Maier Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:44:56 +0000 (+0100) Subject: scsi: zfcp: fix missing erp_lock in port recovery trigger for point-to-point X-Git-Tag: v4.9.220~78 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4224680529164e09c4ad2408248616c0232681f7;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-amlogic.git scsi: zfcp: fix missing erp_lock in port recovery trigger for point-to-point commit 819732be9fea728623e1ed84eba28def7384ad1f upstream. v2.6.27 commit cc8c282963bd ("[SCSI] zfcp: Automatically attach remote ports") introduced zfcp automatic port scan. Before that, the user had to use the sysfs attribute "port_add" of an FCP device (adapter) to add and open remote (target) ports, even for the remote peer port in point-to-point topology. That code path did a proper port open recovery trigger taking the erp_lock. Since above commit, a new helper function zfcp_erp_open_ptp_port() performed an UNlocked port open recovery trigger. This can race with other parallel recovery triggers. In zfcp_erp_action_enqueue() this could corrupt e.g. adapter->erp_total_count or adapter->erp_ready_head. As already found for fabric topology in v4.17 commit fa89adba1941 ("scsi: zfcp: fix infinite iteration on ERP ready list"), there was an endless loop during tracing of rport (un)block. A subsequent v4.18 commit 9e156c54ace3 ("scsi: zfcp: assert that the ERP lock is held when tracing a recovery trigger") introduced a lockdep assertion for that case. As a side effect, that lockdep assertion now uncovered the unlocked code path for PtP. It is from within an adapter ERP action: zfcp_erp_strategy[1479] intentionally DROPs erp lock around zfcp_erp_strategy_do_action() zfcp_erp_strategy_do_action[1441] NO erp lock zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy[876] NO erp lock zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_open[855] NO erp lock zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_open_fsf[806]NO erp lock zfcp_erp_adapter_strat_fsf_xconf[772] erp lock only around zfcp_erp_action_to_running(), BUT *_not_* around zfcp_erp_enqueue_ptp_port() zfcp_erp_enqueue_ptp_port[728] BUG: *_not_* taking erp lock _zfcp_erp_port_reopen[432] assumes to be called with erp lock zfcp_erp_action_enqueue[314] assumes to be called with erp lock zfcp_dbf_rec_trig[288] _checks_ to be called with erp lock: lockdep_assert_held(&adapter->erp_lock); It causes the following lockdep warning: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 775 at drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c:288 zfcp_dbf_rec_trig+0x16a/0x188 no locks held by zfcperp0.0.17c0/775. Fix this by using the proper locked recovery trigger helper function. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312174505.51294-2-maier@linux.ibm.com Fixes: cc8c282963bd ("[SCSI] zfcp: Automatically attach remote ports") Cc: #v2.6.27+ Reviewed-by: Jens Remus Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c index d5214c4..d8aee54 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static void zfcp_erp_enqueue_ptp_port(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter) adapter->peer_d_id); if (IS_ERR(port)) /* error or port already attached */ return; - _zfcp_erp_port_reopen(port, 0, "ereptp1"); + zfcp_erp_port_reopen(port, 0, "ereptp1"); } static int zfcp_erp_adapter_strat_fsf_xconf(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)