From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:54:59 +0000 (+0000) Subject: 2002-12-04 David Carlton X-Git-Tag: cagney-unwind-20030108-branchpoint~496 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=406bc4de57874e2615bbc431d859045e5626610a;p=external%2Fbinutils.git 2002-12-04 David Carlton * symtab.c (lookup_symbol_aux): Move minsym code into a separate function. (lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms): New function. --- diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 6ce60aa..bed9a7c 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2002-12-04 David Carlton + + * symtab.c (lookup_symbol_aux): Move minsym code into a separate + function. + (lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms): New function. + 2002-12-04 J. Brobecker * pa64solib.c: s/boolean/int/. Fixes a build failure on hppa64-hpux. diff --git a/gdb/symtab.c b/gdb/symtab.c index ef70e3f..a891d35 100644 --- a/gdb/symtab.c +++ b/gdb/symtab.c @@ -103,6 +103,14 @@ struct symbol *lookup_symbol_aux_psymtabs (int block_index, const namespace_enum namespace, struct symtab **symtab); +static +struct symbol *lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms (const char *name, + const char *mangled_name, + const namespace_enum namespace, + int *is_a_field_of_this, + struct symtab **symtab, + int *force_return); + static struct symbol *find_active_alias (struct symbol *sym, CORE_ADDR addr); /* This flag is used in hppa-tdep.c, and set in hp-symtab-read.c */ @@ -786,9 +794,14 @@ lookup_symbol_aux (const char *name, const char *mangled_name, int *is_a_field_of_this, struct symtab **symtab) { struct symbol *sym; - struct symtab *s = NULL; - struct blockvector *bv; - struct minimal_symbol *msymbol; + + /* FIXME: carlton/2002-11-05: This variable is here so that + lookup_symbol_aux will sometimes return NULL after receiving a + NULL return value from lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms, without + proceeding on to the partial symtab and static variable tests. I + suspect that that's a bad idea. */ + + int force_return; /* Search specified block and its superiors. */ @@ -875,65 +888,14 @@ lookup_symbol_aux (const char *name, const char *mangled_name, a mangled variable that is stored in one of the minimal symbol tables. Eventually, all global symbols might be resolved in this way. */ - if (namespace == VAR_NAMESPACE) - { - msymbol = lookup_minimal_symbol (name, NULL, NULL); - if (msymbol != NULL) - { - s = find_pc_sect_symtab (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol), - SYMBOL_BFD_SECTION (msymbol)); - if (s != NULL) - { - /* This is a function which has a symtab for its address. */ - bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s); - block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK); + force_return = 0; - /* This call used to pass `SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol)' as the - `name' argument to lookup_block_symbol. But the name - of a minimal symbol is always mangled, so that seems - to be clearly the wrong thing to pass as the - unmangled name. */ - sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace); - /* We kept static functions in minimal symbol table as well as - in static scope. We want to find them in the symbol table. */ - if (!sym) - { - block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK); - sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, - mangled_name, namespace); - } - - /* sym == 0 if symbol was found in the minimal symbol table - but not in the symtab. - Return 0 to use the msymbol definition of "foo_". - - This happens for Fortran "foo_" symbols, - which are "foo" in the symtab. - - This can also happen if "asm" is used to make a - regular symbol but not a debugging symbol, e.g. - asm(".globl _main"); - asm("_main:"); - */ - - if (symtab != NULL) - *symtab = s; - return fixup_symbol_section (sym, s->objfile); - } - else if (MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_text - && MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_file_text - && !STREQ (name, SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol))) - { - /* This is a mangled variable, look it up by its - mangled name. */ - return lookup_symbol_aux (SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol), mangled_name, NULL, - namespace, is_a_field_of_this, symtab); - } - /* There are no debug symbols for this file, or we are looking - for an unmangled variable. - Try to find a matching static symbol below. */ - } - } + sym = lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms (name, mangled_name, + namespace, is_a_field_of_this, + symtab, &force_return); + + if (sym != NULL || force_return == 1) + return sym; #endif @@ -975,87 +937,15 @@ lookup_symbol_aux (const char *name, const char *mangled_name, the static check in this case? */ - if (namespace == VAR_NAMESPACE) - { - msymbol = lookup_minimal_symbol (name, NULL, NULL); - if (msymbol != NULL) - { - /* OK, we found a minimal symbol in spite of not - * finding any symbol. There are various possible - * explanations for this. One possibility is the symbol - * exists in code not compiled -g. Another possibility - * is that the 'psymtab' isn't doing its job. - * A third possibility, related to #2, is that we were confused - * by name-mangling. For instance, maybe the psymtab isn't - * doing its job because it only know about demangled - * names, but we were given a mangled name... - */ - - /* We first use the address in the msymbol to try to - * locate the appropriate symtab. Note that find_pc_symtab() - * has a side-effect of doing psymtab-to-symtab expansion, - * for the found symtab. - */ - s = find_pc_symtab (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol)); - if (s != NULL) - { - bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s); - block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK); - /* This call used to pass `SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol)' as the - `name' argument to lookup_block_symbol. But the name - of a minimal symbol is always mangled, so that seems - to be clearly the wrong thing to pass as the - unmangled name. */ - sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace); - /* We kept static functions in minimal symbol table as well as - in static scope. We want to find them in the symbol table. */ - if (!sym) - { - block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK); - sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, - mangled_name, namespace); - } - /* If we found one, return it */ - if (sym) - { - if (symtab != NULL) - *symtab = s; - return sym; - } - /* If we get here with sym == 0, the symbol was - found in the minimal symbol table - but not in the symtab. - Fall through and return 0 to use the msymbol - definition of "foo_". - (Note that outer code generally follows up a call - to this routine with a call to lookup_minimal_symbol(), - so a 0 return means we'll just flow into that other routine). - - This happens for Fortran "foo_" symbols, - which are "foo" in the symtab. - - This can also happen if "asm" is used to make a - regular symbol but not a debugging symbol, e.g. - asm(".globl _main"); - asm("_main:"); - */ - } + force_return = 0; - /* If the lookup-by-address fails, try repeating the - * entire lookup process with the symbol name from - * the msymbol (if different from the original symbol name). - */ - else if (MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_text - && MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_file_text - && !STREQ (name, SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol))) - { - return lookup_symbol_aux (SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol), mangled_name, - NULL, namespace, is_a_field_of_this, - symtab); - } - } - } + sym = lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms (name, mangled_name, + namespace, is_a_field_of_this, + symtab, &force_return); + + if (sym != NULL || force_return == 1) + return sym; #endif @@ -1202,6 +1092,130 @@ lookup_symbol_aux_psymtabs (int block_index, const char *name, return NULL; } +/* Check for the possibility of the symbol being a function or a + mangled variable that is stored in one of the minimal symbol + tables. Eventually, all global symbols might be resolved in this + way. */ + +static struct symbol * +lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms (const char *name, + const char *mangled_name, + const namespace_enum namespace, + int *is_a_field_of_this, + struct symtab **symtab, + int *force_return) +{ + struct symbol *sym; + struct blockvector *bv; + const struct block *block; + struct minimal_symbol *msymbol; + struct symtab *s; + + if (namespace == VAR_NAMESPACE) + { + msymbol = lookup_minimal_symbol (name, NULL, NULL); + + if (msymbol != NULL) + { + /* OK, we found a minimal symbol in spite of not finding any + symbol. There are various possible explanations for + this. One possibility is the symbol exists in code not + compiled -g. Another possibility is that the 'psymtab' + isn't doing its job. A third possibility, related to #2, + is that we were confused by name-mangling. For instance, + maybe the psymtab isn't doing its job because it only + know about demangled names, but we were given a mangled + name... */ + + /* We first use the address in the msymbol to try to locate + the appropriate symtab. Note that find_pc_sect_symtab() + has a side-effect of doing psymtab-to-symtab expansion, + for the found symtab. */ + s = find_pc_sect_symtab (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol), + SYMBOL_BFD_SECTION (msymbol)); + if (s != NULL) + { + /* This is a function which has a symtab for its address. */ + bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s); + block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK); + + /* This call used to pass `SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol)' as the + `name' argument to lookup_block_symbol. But the name + of a minimal symbol is always mangled, so that seems + to be clearly the wrong thing to pass as the + unmangled name. */ + sym = + lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace); + /* We kept static functions in minimal symbol table as well as + in static scope. We want to find them in the symbol table. */ + if (!sym) + { + block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK); + sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, + mangled_name, namespace); + } + + /* NOTE: carlton/2002-12-04: The following comment was + taken from a time when two versions of this function + were part of the body of lookup_symbol_aux: this + comment was taken from the version of the function + that was #ifdef HPUXHPPA, and the comment was right + before the 'return NULL' part of lookup_symbol_aux. + (Hence the "Fall through and return 0" comment.) + Elena did some digging into the situation for + Fortran, and she reports: + + "I asked around (thanks to Jeff Knaggs), and I think + the story for Fortran goes like this: + + "Apparently, in older Fortrans, '_' was not part of + the user namespace. g77 attached a final '_' to + procedure names as the exported symbols for linkage + (foo_) , but the symbols went in the debug info just + like 'foo'. The rationale behind this is not + completely clear, and maybe it was done to other + symbols as well, not just procedures." */ + + /* If we get here with sym == 0, the symbol was + found in the minimal symbol table + but not in the symtab. + Fall through and return 0 to use the msymbol + definition of "foo_". + (Note that outer code generally follows up a call + to this routine with a call to lookup_minimal_symbol(), + so a 0 return means we'll just flow into that other routine). + + This happens for Fortran "foo_" symbols, + which are "foo" in the symtab. + + This can also happen if "asm" is used to make a + regular symbol but not a debugging symbol, e.g. + asm(".globl _main"); + asm("_main:"); + */ + + if (symtab != NULL && sym != NULL) + *symtab = s; + *force_return = 1; + return fixup_symbol_section (sym, s->objfile); + } + else if (MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_text + && MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_file_text + && !STREQ (name, SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol))) + { + /* This is a mangled variable, look it up by its + mangled name. */ + *force_return = 1; + return lookup_symbol_aux (SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol), mangled_name, + NULL, namespace, is_a_field_of_this, + symtab); + } + } + } + + return NULL; +} + /* Look, in partial_symtab PST, for symbol NAME. Check the global symbols if GLOBAL, the static symbols if not */