From: Jani Nikula Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:49:16 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm/i915/gt: remove some limited use register access wrappers X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~1918^2~16^2~380 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4050e6f211ea521eb703c921cdb15b905be882b2;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git drm/i915/gt: remove some limited use register access wrappers Remove rmw_set(), rmw_clear(), clear_register(), rmw_set_fw(), and rmw_clear_fw(). They're just one too many levels of abstraction for register access, for very specific purposes. clear_register() seems like a micro-optimization bypassing the write when the register is already clear, but that trick has ceased to work since commit 06b975d58fd6 ("drm/i915: make intel_uncore_rmw() write unconditionally"). Just clear the register in the most obvious way. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi Reviewed-by: Matt Roper Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221123164916.4128733-1-jani.nikula@intel.com --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c index 42b9e2bc7..2bf2ec7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c @@ -218,21 +218,6 @@ out: return ret; } -static void rmw_set(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u32 set) -{ - intel_uncore_rmw(uncore, reg, 0, set); -} - -static void rmw_clear(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u32 clr) -{ - intel_uncore_rmw(uncore, reg, clr, 0); -} - -static void clear_register(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) -{ - intel_uncore_rmw(uncore, reg, 0, 0); -} - static void gen6_clear_engine_error_register(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) { GEN6_RING_FAULT_REG_RMW(engine, RING_FAULT_VALID, 0); @@ -258,14 +243,14 @@ intel_gt_clear_error_registers(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 eir; if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) != 2) - clear_register(uncore, PGTBL_ER); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, PGTBL_ER, 0); if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 4) - clear_register(uncore, IPEIR(RENDER_RING_BASE)); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, IPEIR(RENDER_RING_BASE), 0); else - clear_register(uncore, IPEIR_I965); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, IPEIR_I965, 0); - clear_register(uncore, EIR); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, EIR, 0); eir = intel_uncore_read(uncore, EIR); if (eir) { /* @@ -273,7 +258,7 @@ intel_gt_clear_error_registers(struct intel_gt *gt, * mask them. */ drm_dbg(>->i915->drm, "EIR stuck: 0x%08x, masking\n", eir); - rmw_set(uncore, EMR, eir); + intel_uncore_rmw(uncore, EMR, 0, eir); intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN2_IIR, I915_MASTER_ERROR_INTERRUPT); } @@ -283,10 +268,10 @@ intel_gt_clear_error_registers(struct intel_gt *gt, RING_FAULT_VALID, 0); intel_gt_mcr_read_any(gt, XEHP_RING_FAULT_REG); } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) { - rmw_clear(uncore, GEN12_RING_FAULT_REG, RING_FAULT_VALID); + intel_uncore_rmw(uncore, GEN12_RING_FAULT_REG, RING_FAULT_VALID, 0); intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, GEN12_RING_FAULT_REG); } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 8) { - rmw_clear(uncore, GEN8_RING_FAULT_REG, RING_FAULT_VALID); + intel_uncore_rmw(uncore, GEN8_RING_FAULT_REG, RING_FAULT_VALID, 0); intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, GEN8_RING_FAULT_REG); } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 6) { struct intel_engine_cs *engine; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c index 24736eb..ffde89c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c @@ -35,16 +35,6 @@ /* XXX How to handle concurrent GGTT updates using tiling registers? */ #define RESET_UNDER_STOP_MACHINE 0 -static void rmw_set_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u32 set) -{ - intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, reg, 0, set); -} - -static void rmw_clear_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u32 clr) -{ - intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, reg, clr, 0); -} - static void client_mark_guilty(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, bool banned) { struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = ctx->file_priv; @@ -212,7 +202,7 @@ static int g4x_do_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, int ret; /* WaVcpClkGateDisableForMediaReset:ctg,elk */ - rmw_set_fw(uncore, VDECCLK_GATE_D, VCP_UNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE); + intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, VDECCLK_GATE_D, 0, VCP_UNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE); intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(uncore, VDECCLK_GATE_D); pci_write_config_byte(pdev, I915_GDRST, @@ -234,7 +224,7 @@ static int g4x_do_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, out: pci_write_config_byte(pdev, I915_GDRST, 0); - rmw_clear_fw(uncore, VDECCLK_GATE_D, VCP_UNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE); + intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, VDECCLK_GATE_D, VCP_UNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE, 0); intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(uncore, VDECCLK_GATE_D); return ret; @@ -448,7 +438,7 @@ static int gen11_lock_sfc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, * to reset it as well (we will unlock it once the reset sequence is * completed). */ - rmw_set_fw(uncore, sfc_lock.lock_reg, sfc_lock.lock_bit); + intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, sfc_lock.lock_reg, 0, sfc_lock.lock_bit); ret = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore, sfc_lock.ack_reg, @@ -498,7 +488,7 @@ static void gen11_unlock_sfc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) get_sfc_forced_lock_data(engine, &sfc_lock); - rmw_clear_fw(uncore, sfc_lock.lock_reg, sfc_lock.lock_bit); + intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, sfc_lock.lock_reg, sfc_lock.lock_bit, 0); } static int __gen11_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,