From: Hans de Goede Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:33:33 +0000 (+0200) Subject: media: ov2680: Fix ov2680_enum_frame_interval() X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~2014^2~35 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4007015e604f680999c764be84b84aea7319fb0b;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git media: ov2680: Fix ov2680_enum_frame_interval() Fix and simplify ov2680_enum_frame_interval(), the index is not an index into ov2680_mode_data[], so using OV2680_MODE_MAX is wrong. Instead it is an index indexing the different framerates for the resolution specified in fie->width, fie->height. Note validating fie->which is not necessary this is already done by the v4l2-core. Acked-by: Rui Miguel Silva Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov2680.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov2680.c index 0adfacc..a83efd4 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov2680.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov2680.c @@ -527,21 +527,30 @@ static int ov2680_enum_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, return 0; } +static bool ov2680_valid_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval_enum *fie) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < OV2680_MODE_MAX; i++) { + if (fie->width == ov2680_mode_data[i].width && + fie->height == ov2680_mode_data[i].height) + return true; + } + + return false; +} + static int ov2680_enum_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state, struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval_enum *fie) { - struct v4l2_fract tpf; + struct ov2680_dev *sensor = to_ov2680_dev(sd); - if (fie->index >= OV2680_MODE_MAX || fie->width > OV2680_WIDTH_MAX || - fie->height > OV2680_HEIGHT_MAX || - fie->which > V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE) + /* Only 1 framerate */ + if (fie->index || !ov2680_valid_frame_size(fie)) return -EINVAL; - tpf.denominator = OV2680_FRAME_RATE; - tpf.numerator = 1; - - fie->interval = tpf; + fie->interval = sensor->frame_interval; return 0; }