From: Minghao Chi Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 09:36:56 +0000 (+0000) Subject: spi: spi-cadence-quadspi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync X-Git-Tag: v6.1-rc5~1198^2~49 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3a2ac5809935e6043dae916bab6cf4741d9dcdeb;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git spi: spi-cadence-quadspi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code Reported-by: Zeal Robot Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220413093656.2538504-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c index 0e8dafc..7d7091a 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c @@ -262,9 +262,8 @@ static int spi_mem_access_start(struct spi_mem *mem) if (ctlr->auto_runtime_pm) { int ret; - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctlr->dev.parent); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ctlr->dev.parent); if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(ctlr->dev.parent); dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n", ret); return ret;