From: Jens Axboe Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 20:42:24 +0000 (-0700) Subject: io_uring: include task_work run after scheduling in wait for events X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~3656^2~24 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=35d90f95cfa773b7e3b1f57ba15ce06a470f354c;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git io_uring: include task_work run after scheduling in wait for events It's quite possible that we got woken up because task_work was queued, and we need to process this task_work to generate the events waited for. If we return to the wait loop without running task_work, we'll end up adding the task to the waitqueue again, only to call io_cqring_wait_schedule() again which will run the task_work. This is less efficient than it could be, as it requires adding to the cq_wait queue again. It also triggers the wakeup path for completions as cq_wait is now non-empty with the task itself, and it'll require another lock grab and deletion to remove ourselves from the waitqueue. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 16a323a..ff2bbac 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -2481,7 +2481,14 @@ static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, } if (!schedule_hrtimeout(&timeout, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS)) return -ETIME; - return 1; + + /* + * Run task_work after scheduling. If we got woken because of + * task_work being processed, run it now rather than let the caller + * do another wait loop. + */ + ret = io_run_task_work_sig(ctx); + return ret < 0 ? ret : 1; } /* @@ -2546,6 +2553,8 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events, prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&ctx->cq_wait, &iowq.wq, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); ret = io_cqring_wait_schedule(ctx, &iowq, timeout); + if (__io_cqring_events_user(ctx) >= min_events) + break; cond_resched(); } while (ret > 0);