From: Viresh Kumar Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:38:51 +0000 (+0000) Subject: cpufreq: Don't check cpu_online(policy->cpu) X-Git-Tag: v3.9-rc1~81^2~2^2~20 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3361b7b173341fdaa85153e1b322099949c9f8c8;p=profile%2Fivi%2Fkernel-x86-ivi.git cpufreq: Don't check cpu_online(policy->cpu) policy->cpu or cpus in policy->cpus can't be offline anymore. And so we don't need to check if they are online or not. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index b63b3cb..0dc9933 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -76,10 +76,6 @@ static int lock_policy_rwsem_##mode \ int policy_cpu = per_cpu(cpufreq_policy_cpu, cpu); \ BUG_ON(policy_cpu == -1); \ down_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy_cpu)); \ - if (unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))) { \ - up_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy_cpu)); \ - return -1; \ - } \ \ return 0; \ } @@ -720,8 +716,6 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev_symlink(unsigned int cpu, if (j == cpu) continue; - if (!cpu_online(j)) - continue; pr_debug("CPU %u already managed, adding link\n", j); managed_policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); @@ -778,8 +772,6 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev_interface(unsigned int cpu, spin_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) { - if (!cpu_online(j)) - continue; per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, j) = policy; per_cpu(cpufreq_policy_cpu, j) = policy->cpu; } @@ -1006,11 +998,8 @@ static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu) policy->last_cpu = policy->cpu; policy->cpu = cpu; - for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) { - if (!cpu_online(j)) - continue; + for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) per_cpu(cpufreq_policy_cpu, j) = cpu; - } #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE cpufreq_frequency_table_update_policy_cpu(policy); @@ -1470,7 +1459,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (target_freq == policy->cur) return 0; - if (cpu_online(policy->cpu) && cpufreq_driver->target) + if (cpufreq_driver->target) retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation); return retval; @@ -1508,7 +1497,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_getavg(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu) if (cpufreq_disabled()) return ret; - if (!(cpu_online(cpu) && cpufreq_driver->getavg)) + if (!cpufreq_driver->getavg) return 0; policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(policy->cpu); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c index 79795c4..e4a306c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, switch (event) { case CPUFREQ_GOV_START: - if ((!cpu_online(cpu)) || (!policy->cur)) + if (!policy->cur) return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(&dbs_data->mutex); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c index c8c3d29..bbeb9c0 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c @@ -118,8 +118,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_userspace(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, switch (event) { case CPUFREQ_GOV_START: - if (!cpu_online(cpu)) - return -EINVAL; BUG_ON(!policy->cur); mutex_lock(&userspace_mutex); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c index aa5bd39..d7a7966 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c @@ -63,9 +63,6 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, pr_debug("request for verification of policy (%u - %u kHz) for cpu %u\n", policy->min, policy->max, policy->cpu); - if (!cpu_online(policy->cpu)) - return -EINVAL; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); @@ -121,9 +118,6 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, break; } - if (!cpu_online(policy->cpu)) - return -EINVAL; - for (i = 0; (table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END); i++) { unsigned int freq = table[i].frequency; if (freq == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)