From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:01:35 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: x86/nospec: Fix i386 RSB stuffing
X-Git-Tag: v6.1-rc5~366^2~12
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=332924973725e8cdcc783c175f68cf7e162cb9e5;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git

x86/nospec: Fix i386 RSB stuffing

Turns out that i386 doesn't unconditionally have LFENCE, as such the
loop in __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER isn't actually speculation safe on such
chips.

Fixes: ba6e31af2be9 ("x86/speculation: Add LFENCE to RSB fill sequence")
Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yv9tj9vbQ9nNlXoY@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
---

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index 10731cc..c936ce9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
  * the optimal version - two calls, each with their own speculation
  * trap should their return address end up getting used, in a loop.
  */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 #define __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(reg, nr)			\
 	mov	$(nr/2), reg;				\
 771:							\
@@ -60,6 +61,17 @@
 	jnz	771b;					\
 	/* barrier for jnz misprediction */		\
 	lfence;
+#else
+/*
+ * i386 doesn't unconditionally have LFENCE, as such it can't
+ * do a loop.
+ */
+#define __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(reg, nr)			\
+	.rept nr;					\
+	__FILL_RETURN_SLOT;				\
+	.endr;						\
+	add	$(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * nr, %_ASM_SP;
+#endif
 
 /*
  * Stuff a single RSB slot.