From: Johannes Thumshirn Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:06:03 +0000 (+0200) Subject: lpfc: call lpfc_sli_validate_fcp_iocb() with the hbalock held X-Git-Tag: v4.8-rc1~20^2~13 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=31979008fdae72d7441643f3a5b1bdaedf481335;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git lpfc: call lpfc_sli_validate_fcp_iocb() with the hbalock held Call lpfc_sli_validate_fcp_iocb() with the hbalock held, as the pointer to iocbq is not guaranteed to still be valid after looking it up. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman Acked-by: James Smart Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c index c8fd0a3..351d08a 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c @@ -10203,6 +10203,7 @@ lpfc_sli_sum_iocb(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint16_t tgt_id, uint64_t lun_id, struct lpfc_iocbq *iocbq; int sum, i; + spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock); for (i = 1, sum = 0; i <= phba->sli.last_iotag; i++) { iocbq = phba->sli.iocbq_lookup[i]; @@ -10210,6 +10211,7 @@ lpfc_sli_sum_iocb(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint16_t tgt_id, uint64_t lun_id, ctx_cmd) == 0) sum++; } + spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock); return sum; }