From: Antonio Quartulli Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:25:43 +0000 (+0100) Subject: wireguard: avoid double unlikely() notation when using IS_ERR() X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/unified/20230118.172025~7734^2~12^2~6 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=30ac4e2f54ec067b7b9ca0db27e75681581378d6;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git wireguard: avoid double unlikely() notation when using IS_ERR() The definition of IS_ERR() already applies the unlikely() notation when checking the error status of the passed pointer. For this reason there is no need to have the same notation outside of IS_ERR() itself. Clean up code by removing redundant notation. Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c index a3ed49c..cd51a2a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t wg_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) } else { struct sk_buff *segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, 0); - if (unlikely(IS_ERR(segs))) { + if (IS_ERR(segs)) { ret = PTR_ERR(segs); goto err_peer; } diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c index 410b318..41430c0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int send4(struct wg_device *wg, struct sk_buff *skb, ip_rt_put(rt); rt = ip_route_output_flow(sock_net(sock), &fl, sock); } - if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rt))) { + if (IS_ERR(rt)) { ret = PTR_ERR(rt); net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: No route to %pISpfsc, error %d\n", wg->dev->name, &endpoint->addr, ret); @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int send6(struct wg_device *wg, struct sk_buff *skb, } dst = ipv6_stub->ipv6_dst_lookup_flow(sock_net(sock), sock, &fl, NULL); - if (unlikely(IS_ERR(dst))) { + if (IS_ERR(dst)) { ret = PTR_ERR(dst); net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: No route to %pISpfsc, error %d\n", wg->dev->name, &endpoint->addr, ret);