From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 23:19:23 +0000 (-0800) Subject: Merge branch 'bpf: Fix to preserve reg parent/live fields when copying range info' X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~5654^2~35^2~3 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2eecf81e149cd718754f52a4b688b237d2a8244d;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git Merge branch 'bpf: Fix to preserve reg parent/live fields when copying range info' Eduard Zingerman says: ==================== Struct bpf_reg_state is copied directly in several places including: - check_stack_write_fixed_off() (via save_register_state()); - check_stack_read_fixed_off(); - find_equal_scalars(). However, a literal copy of this struct also copies the following fields: struct bpf_reg_state { ... struct bpf_reg_state *parent; ... enum bpf_reg_liveness live; ... }; This breaks register parentage chain and liveness marking logic. The commit message for the first patch has a detailed example. This patch-set replaces direct copies with a call to a function copy_register_state(dst,src), which preserves 'parent' and 'live' fields of the 'dst'. The fix comes with a significant verifier runtime penalty for some selftest binaries listed in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/veristat.cfg and cilium BPF binaries (see [1]): $ ./veristat -e file,prog,states -C -f 'states_diff>10' master-baseline.log current.log File Program States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) -------------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- --------------- bpf_host.o tail_handle_ipv4_from_host 231 299 +68 (+29.44%) bpf_host.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 1088 1320 +232 (+21.32%) bpf_host.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 716 729 +13 (+1.82%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 281 314 +33 (+11.74%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 245 256 +11 (+4.49%) bpf_lxc.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 1088 1320 +232 (+21.32%) bpf_lxc.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 716 729 +13 (+1.82%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_egress 239 262 +23 (+9.62%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_ingress 239 262 +23 (+9.62%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_ingress_policy_only 239 262 +23 (+9.62%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_egress 181 195 +14 (+7.73%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_ingress 181 195 +14 (+7.73%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_ingress_policy_only 181 195 +14 (+7.73%) bpf_lxc.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 281 314 +33 (+11.74%) bpf_lxc.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 245 256 +11 (+4.49%) bpf_overlay.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 799 829 +30 (+3.75%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 281 314 +33 (+11.74%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 245 256 +11 (+4.49%) bpf_sock.o cil_sock4_connect 47 70 +23 (+48.94%) bpf_sock.o cil_sock4_sendmsg 45 68 +23 (+51.11%) bpf_sock.o cil_sock6_post_bind 31 42 +11 (+35.48%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 4413 6457 +2044 (+46.32%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv6 6876 7249 +373 (+5.42%) test_cls_redirect.bpf.o cls_redirect 4704 4799 +95 (+2.02%) test_tcp_hdr_options.bpf.o estab 180 206 +26 (+14.44%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.o syncookie_tc 21059 21485 +426 (+2.02%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.o syncookie_xdp 21857 23122 +1265 (+5.79%) -------------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- --------------- I looked through verification log for bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 program in order to identify the reason for ~50% visited states increase. The slowdown is triggered by a difference in handling of three stack slots: fp-56, fp-72 and fp-80, with the main difference coming from fp-72. In fact the following change removes all the difference: @@ -3256,7 +3256,10 @@ static void save_register_state(struct bpf_func_state *state, { int i; - copy_register_state(&state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, reg); + if ((spi == 6 /*56*/ || spi == 8 /*72*/ || spi == 9 /*80*/) && size != BPF_REG_SIZE) + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = *reg; + else + copy_register_state(&state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, reg); For fp-56 I found the following pattern for divergences between verification logs with and w/o this patch: - At some point insn 1862 is reached and checkpoint is created; - At some other point insn 1862 is reached again: - with this patch: - the current state is considered *not* equivalent to the old checkpoint; - the reason for mismatch is the state of fp-56: - current state: fp-56=????mmmm - checkpoint: fp-56_rD=mmmmmmmm - without this patch the current state is considered equivalent to the checkpoint, the fp-56 is not present in the checkpoint. Here is a fragment of the verification log for when the checkpoint in question created at insn 1862: checkpoint 1862: ... fp-56=mmmmmmmm ... 1862: ... 1863: ... 1864: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0) 1865: ... 1866: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -56) = r1 ; R1_w=scalar(...) R10=fp0 fp-56= 1867: (bf) r2 = r10 ; R2_w=fp0 R10=fp0 1868: (07) r2 += -56 ; R2_w=fp-56 ; return map_lookup_elem(&LB4_BACKEND_MAP_V2, &backend_id); 1869: (18) r1 = 0xffff888100286000 ; R1_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) 1871: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 - Without this patch: - at insn 1864 r1 liveness is set to REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; - at insn 1866 fp-56 liveness is set REG_LIVE_WRITTEN mark because of the direct r1 copy in save_register_state(); - at insn 1871 REG_LIVE_READ is not propagated to fp-56 at checkpoint 1862 because of the REG_LIVE_WRITTEN mark; - eventually fp-56 is pruned from checkpoint at 1862 in clean_func_state(). - With this patch: - at insn 1864 r1 liveness is set to REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; - at insn 1866 fp-56 liveness is *not* set to REG_LIVE_WRITTEN mark because write size is not equal to BPF_REG_SIZE; - at insn 1871 REG_LIVE_READ is propagated to fp-56 at checkpoint 1862. Hence more states have to be visited by verifier with this patch compared to current master. Similar patterns could be found for both fp-72 and fp-80, although these are harder to track trough the log because of a big number of insns between slot write and bpf_map_lookup_elem() call triggering read mark, boils down to the following C code: struct ipv4_frag_id frag_id = { .daddr = ip4->daddr, .saddr = ip4->saddr, .id = ip4->id, .proto = ip4->protocol, .pad = 0, }; ... map_lookup_elem(..., &frag_id); Where: - .id is mapped to fp-72, write of size u16; - .saddr is mapped to fp-80, write of size u32. This patch-set is a continuation of discussion from [2]. Changes v1 -> v2 (no changes in the code itself): - added analysis for the tail_lb_ipv4 verification slowdown; - rebase against fresh master branch. [1] git@github.com:anakryiko/cilium.git [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/517af2c57ee4b9ce2d96a8cf33f7295f2d2dfe13.camel@gmail.com/ ==================== Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- 2eecf81e149cd718754f52a4b688b237d2a8244d