From: Maoni Stephens Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:01:28 +0000 (-0800) Subject: Updated instructions with more explanation on how long to run stress for X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/base/20180629.140029~7217^2~3 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2e2b3c59da525fcc41559932aa71f012e23c2433;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fcoreclr.git Updated instructions with more explanation on how long to run stress for [tfs-changeset: 1408043] --- diff --git a/tests/src/GC/Stress/stress_run_readme.txt b/tests/src/GC/Stress/stress_run_readme.txt index 3128fd2..f7ba887 100644 --- a/tests/src/GC/Stress/stress_run_readme.txt +++ b/tests/src/GC/Stress/stress_run_readme.txt @@ -28,13 +28,28 @@ To run stress: (or if you copied testmix_gc.config somewhere else you need to tell it so, eg, c:\TestConfigs\testmix_gc.config) +We recommand to run it for 48 hours (see the comments below on maximumExecutionTime in test config for more detail). + 4. Test config There are a few interesting things in this config: -suppressConsoleOutputFromTests <-- set this to true if you want to see the console output from tests. -concurrentCopies="1" <-- if you specify this to something >1 it will load that many concurrent copies. + suppressConsoleOutputFromTests -Feel free to write your own tests and put them in the Tests directory and specify them in the config to run. +Set this to true if you want to see the console output from tests. + + concurrentCopies + +If you specify this to something >1 it will load that many concurrent copies. + + maximumExecutionTime +Right now I set it to about 15 hours (instead of 48) because some of the tests will keep growing in memory usage. If you don't have a machine with a decent amount of memory you can change this to a smaller amount. You can always run this in a loop in a .cmd file for 48 hours: + +:test +%CORE_ROOT%\corerun ReliabilityFramework.exe testmix_gc.config +goto test + +Feel free to write your own tests and put them in the Tests directory and specify them in the config to run. +If you get an AV, often you would see it in different tests. But if you do get one that's consistently in one test, it's a good sign - it means it's likely that running that one test will give you the AV sooner because it exhibits a certain pattern that causes the AV.