From: Herbert Xu Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:25:29 +0000 (-0800) Subject: [SCTP]: Fix up sctp_rcv return value X-Git-Tag: v2.6.17-rc1~738^2~4 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2babf9daae4a3561f3264638a22ac7d0b14a6f52;p=profile%2Fivi%2Fkernel-x86-ivi.git [SCTP]: Fix up sctp_rcv return value I was working on the ipip/xfrm problem and as usual I get side-tracked by other problems. As part of an attempt to change the IPv4 protocol handler calling convention I found that SCTP violated the existing convention. It's returning non-zero values after freeing the skb. This is doubly bad as 1) the skb gets resubmitted; 2) the return value is interpreted as a protocol number. This patch changes those return values to zero. IPv6 doesn't suffer from this problem because it uses a positive return value as an indication for resubmission. So the only effect of this patch there is to increment the IPSTATS_MIB_INDELIVERS counter which IMHO is the right thing to do. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/sctp/input.c b/net/sctp/input.c index cb78b50..d117ebc 100644 --- a/net/sctp/input.c +++ b/net/sctp/input.c @@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ int sctp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) union sctp_addr dest; int family; struct sctp_af *af; - int ret = 0; if (skb->pkt_type!=PACKET_HOST) goto discard_it; @@ -227,16 +226,13 @@ int sctp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) goto discard_release; nf_reset(skb); - ret = sk_filter(sk, skb, 1); - if (ret) + if (sk_filter(sk, skb, 1)) goto discard_release; /* Create an SCTP packet structure. */ chunk = sctp_chunkify(skb, asoc, sk); - if (!chunk) { - ret = -ENOMEM; + if (!chunk) goto discard_release; - } SCTP_INPUT_CB(skb)->chunk = chunk; /* Remember what endpoint is to handle this packet. */ @@ -277,11 +273,11 @@ int sctp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk); sock_put(sk); - return ret; + return 0; discard_it: kfree_skb(skb); - return ret; + return 0; discard_release: /* Release any structures we may be holding. */