From: Chuck Lever Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 14:01:30 +0000 (-0400) Subject: MAINTAINERS: NFSD should be responsible for fs/exportfs X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~3576^2~36 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=296f3d7f419e02d676761aff06502fa005e13b52;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git MAINTAINERS: NFSD should be responsible for fs/exportfs We recently received a patch for fs/exportfs/expfs.c, but there isn't a subsystem maintainer listed for fs/exportfs: Christian Brauner (commit_signer:2/2=100%,authored:1/2=50%,added_lines:3/6=50%,removed_lines:2/6=33%) Al Viro (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,added_lines:3/6=50%,removed_lines:4/6=67%) Miklos Szeredi (commit_signer:1/2=50%) Amir Goldstein (commit_signer:1/2=50%) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Neil says: > Looking at recent commits, patches come in through multiple > different trees. > nfsd certainly has an interest in expfs.c. The only other user is > name_to_handle/open_by_handle API. > I see it as primarily nfsd functionality which is useful enough to > be exported directly to user-space. > (It was created by me when I was nfsd maintainer - does that > count?) Suggested-by: Neil Brown Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever Acked-by: Jeff Layton --- diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 69565ac..50aa3ee 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -11134,6 +11134,7 @@ L: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org S: Supported W: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git +F: fs/exportfs/ F: fs/lockd/ F: fs/nfs_common/ F: fs/nfsd/