From: Fam Zheng Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:37:41 +0000 (+0800) Subject: qemu-img: Speed up comparing empty/zero images X-Git-Tag: TizenStudio_2.0_p2.4~27^2~6^2~8^2~291^2~14 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=25ad8e6e95770d4f01844dc2542d861e73b174b2;p=sdk%2Femulator%2Fqemu.git qemu-img: Speed up comparing empty/zero images Two empty raw files are always compared by actually reading data even if there is no data, because BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO is considered "allocated" in bdrv_is_allocated_above(). That is inefficient. Use bdrv_get_block_status_above() for more information, and skip the consecutive zero sectors. This brings a huge speed up in comparing sparse/empty raw images: $ qemu-img create a 1G $ time ~/build/master/bin/qemu-img compare a a Images are identical. real 0m6.583s user 0m0.191s sys 0m6.367s $ time qemu-img compare a a Images are identical. real 0m0.033s user 0m0.003s sys 0m0.031s Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c index a5949e6..6773943 100644 --- a/qemu-img.c +++ b/qemu-img.c @@ -1071,28 +1071,50 @@ static int img_compare(int argc, char **argv) } for (;;) { + int64_t status1, status2; nb_sectors = sectors_to_process(total_sectors, sector_num); if (nb_sectors <= 0) { break; } - allocated1 = bdrv_is_allocated_above(bs1, NULL, sector_num, nb_sectors, - &pnum1); - if (allocated1 < 0) { + status1 = bdrv_get_block_status_above(bs1, NULL, sector_num, + total_sectors1 - sector_num, + &pnum1); + if (status1 < 0) { ret = 3; error_report("Sector allocation test failed for %s", filename1); goto out; } + allocated1 = status1 & BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED; - allocated2 = bdrv_is_allocated_above(bs2, NULL, sector_num, nb_sectors, - &pnum2); - if (allocated2 < 0) { + status2 = bdrv_get_block_status_above(bs2, NULL, sector_num, + total_sectors2 - sector_num, + &pnum2); + if (status2 < 0) { ret = 3; error_report("Sector allocation test failed for %s", filename2); goto out; } - nb_sectors = MIN(pnum1, pnum2); + allocated2 = status2 & BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED; + if (pnum1) { + nb_sectors = MIN(nb_sectors, pnum1); + } + if (pnum2) { + nb_sectors = MIN(nb_sectors, pnum2); + } - if (allocated1 == allocated2) { + if (strict) { + if ((status1 & ~BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_MASK) != + (status2 & ~BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_MASK)) { + ret = 1; + qprintf(quiet, "Strict mode: Offset %" PRId64 + " block status mismatch!\n", + sectors_to_bytes(sector_num)); + goto out; + } + } + if ((status1 & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO) && (status2 & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO)) { + nb_sectors = MIN(pnum1, pnum2); + } else if (allocated1 == allocated2) { if (allocated1) { ret = blk_read(blk1, sector_num, buf1, nb_sectors); if (ret < 0) { @@ -1120,13 +1142,6 @@ static int img_compare(int argc, char **argv) } } } else { - if (strict) { - ret = 1; - qprintf(quiet, "Strict mode: Offset %" PRId64 - " allocation mismatch!\n", - sectors_to_bytes(sector_num)); - goto out; - } if (allocated1) { ret = check_empty_sectors(blk1, sector_num, nb_sectors,