From: Randy Dunlap Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:22:10 +0000 (-0700) Subject: [PATCH] radeonfb section mismatches X-Git-Tag: v2.6.17-rc3~84 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=246846fc18ba43c4f31d6e5b208fe6b045d9f7b1;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-stable.git [PATCH] radeonfb section mismatches Marking radeon_pci_register() as __devinit clears up all section mismatch warnings that are caused by radeon_pci_register() calling various __devinit function. Is there some reason not to do this? WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x628) WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x6b5) WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x6bd) WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:radeon_probe_screens from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x7d6) WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:radeon_check_modes from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x7e5) Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c b/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c index 9a6b5b3..387a18a 100644 --- a/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c +++ b/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ static struct bin_attribute edid2_attr = { }; -static int radeonfb_pci_register (struct pci_dev *pdev, +static int __devinit radeonfb_pci_register (struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) { struct fb_info *info;