From: Sebastian Dröge Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:45:33 +0000 (+0200) Subject: splitmuxsink: Warn when calculating the next fragment time in timecode mode fails X-Git-Tag: 1.20.0~63 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=241a26631d4cb63138e64f0077a87969f9e87515;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fgstreamer.git splitmuxsink: Warn when calculating the next fragment time in timecode mode fails But only if timecode mode is enabled as it will fail all the time otherwise. Part-of: --- diff --git a/subprojects/gst-plugins-good/gst/multifile/gstsplitmuxsink.c b/subprojects/gst-plugins-good/gst/multifile/gstsplitmuxsink.c index 080510e..1846f42 100644 --- a/subprojects/gst-plugins-good/gst/multifile/gstsplitmuxsink.c +++ b/subprojects/gst-plugins-good/gst/multifile/gstsplitmuxsink.c @@ -792,11 +792,13 @@ gst_splitmux_sink_set_property (GObject * object, guint prop_id, splitmux->threshold_timecode_str = NULL; } } - splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time = GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE; - if (splitmux->tc_interval && splitmux->fragment_start_tc) { - splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time = - calculate_next_max_timecode (splitmux, splitmux->fragment_start_tc, - splitmux->fragment_start_time, NULL); + splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time = + calculate_next_max_timecode (splitmux, splitmux->fragment_start_tc, + splitmux->fragment_start_time, NULL); + if (splitmux->tc_interval && splitmux->fragment_start_tc + && !GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time)) { + GST_WARNING_OBJECT (splitmux, + "Couldn't calculate next fragment start time for timecode mode"); } GST_OBJECT_UNLOCK (splitmux); break; @@ -1540,6 +1542,11 @@ request_next_keyframe (GstSplitMuxSink * splitmux, GstBuffer * buffer, timecode_based = GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (max_tc_time) && GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (next_max_tc_time); + + if (!timecode_based) { + GST_WARNING_OBJECT (splitmux, + "Couldn't calculate maximum fragment time for timecode mode"); + } } else { /* This can happen in the presence of GAP events that trigger * a new fragment start */ @@ -2541,7 +2548,8 @@ handle_gathered_gop (GstSplitMuxSink * splitmux, const InputGop * gop, splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time = calculate_next_max_timecode (splitmux, splitmux->fragment_start_tc, splitmux->fragment_start_time, NULL); - if (!GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time)) { + if (splitmux->tc_interval && splitmux->fragment_start_tc + && !GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time)) { GST_WARNING_OBJECT (splitmux, "Couldn't calculate next fragment start time for timecode mode"); } @@ -2969,7 +2977,12 @@ handle_mq_input (GstPad * pad, GstPadProbeInfo * info, MqStreamCtx * ctx) splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time = calculate_next_max_timecode (splitmux, &tc_meta->tc, running_time, NULL); - + if (splitmux->tc_interval + && !GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (splitmux->next_fragment_start_tc_time)) + { + GST_WARNING_OBJECT (splitmux, + "Couldn't calculate next fragment start time for timecode mode"); + } #ifndef GST_DISABLE_GST_DEBUG { gchar *tc_str;