From: Francisco Jerez Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 23:37:55 +0000 (-0700) Subject: i965: Switch vec4_live_variables to the non-zeroing allocator. X-Git-Tag: upstream/10.0.5~1130 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=23e8673afb56f10f8301fa86e4c2cdfd864eaaf7;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fmesa.git i965: Switch vec4_live_variables to the non-zeroing allocator. All member variables of vec4_live_variables are already being initialized from its constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory, and doing so makes it more likely that we will start relying on the allocator to zero out all memory if the class is ever extended with new member variables. That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful possibilities that come to my mind. Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke --- diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_live_variables.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_live_variables.h index b8ab95a..296468a 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_live_variables.h +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_live_variables.h @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct block_data { class vec4_live_variables { public: - DECLARE_RZALLOC_CXX_OPERATORS(vec4_live_variables) + DECLARE_RALLOC_CXX_OPERATORS(vec4_live_variables) vec4_live_variables(vec4_visitor *v, cfg_t *cfg); ~vec4_live_variables();