From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:12:27 +0000 (+0000) Subject: drm/i915/execlists: Reduce list_for_each_safe+list_safe_reset_next X-Git-Tag: v4.19~298^2~46^2~841 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2221c5b7ddfae1ed1ca8b21a9092d0878281293a;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git drm/i915/execlists: Reduce list_for_each_safe+list_safe_reset_next After staring at the list_for_each_safe macros for a bit, our current invocation of list_safe_reset_next in execlists_schedule() simply reduces to list_for_each. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180102151235.3949-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index 7d1ce21..4e150b0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio) * end result is a topological list of requests in reverse order, the * last element in the list is the request we must execute first. */ - list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, p, &dfs, dfs_link) { + list_for_each_entry(dep, &dfs, dfs_link) { struct i915_priotree *pt = dep->signaler; /* @@ -1048,8 +1048,6 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio) if (prio > READ_ONCE(p->signaler->priority)) list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs); } - - list_safe_reset_next(dep, p, dfs_link); } /*