From: Dmitry Torokhov Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:04:21 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Input: sysrq - add locking to sysrq_filter() X-Git-Tag: v2.6.37-rc1~5^2~3^2~27 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1966cb225c6f9040ca163802cbd052c393d4448f;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-3.10.git Input: sysrq - add locking to sysrq_filter() Similarly to the keyboard handler, we are called by different input devices and thus need to add spinlock if we want to maintain our state properly. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov --- diff --git a/drivers/char/sysrq.c b/drivers/char/sysrq.c index ef31bb8..f0ad694 100644 --- a/drivers/char/sysrq.c +++ b/drivers/char/sysrq.c @@ -566,10 +566,16 @@ static const unsigned char sysrq_xlate[KEY_MAX + 1] = static bool sysrq_down; static int sysrq_alt_use; static int sysrq_alt; +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sysrq_event_lock); static bool sysrq_filter(struct input_handle *handle, unsigned int type, unsigned int code, int value) { + bool suppress; + + /* We are called with interrupts disabled, just take the lock */ + spin_lock(&sysrq_event_lock); + if (type != EV_KEY) goto out; @@ -601,7 +607,10 @@ static bool sysrq_filter(struct input_handle *handle, unsigned int type, } out: - return sysrq_down; + suppress = sysrq_down; + spin_unlock(&sysrq_event_lock); + + return suppress; } static int sysrq_connect(struct input_handler *handler, @@ -652,8 +661,8 @@ static void sysrq_disconnect(struct input_handle *handle) } /* - * We are matching on KEY_LEFTALT insteard of KEY_SYSRQ because not all - * keyboards have SysRq ikey predefined and so user may add it to keymap + * We are matching on KEY_LEFTALT instead of KEY_SYSRQ because not all + * keyboards have SysRq key predefined and so user may add it to keymap * later, but we expect all such keyboards to have left alt. */ static const struct input_device_id sysrq_ids[] = {