From: Sean Christopherson Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:23:57 +0000 (-0700) Subject: KVM: SVM: Skip VMSA init in sev_es_init_vmcb() if pointer is NULL X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~1953^2~2^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1952e74da96fb3e48b72a2d0ece78c688a5848c1;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git KVM: SVM: Skip VMSA init in sev_es_init_vmcb() if pointer is NULL Skip initializing the VMSA physical address in the VMCB if the VMSA is NULL, which occurs during intrahost migration as KVM initializes the VMCB before copying over state from the source to the destination (including the VMSA and its physical address). In normal builds, __pa() is just math, so the bug isn't fatal, but with CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL=y, the validity of the virtual address is verified and passing in NULL will make the kernel unhappy. Fixes: 6defa24d3b12 ("KVM: SEV: Init target VMCBs in sev_migrate_from") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Gonda Reviewed-by: Peter Gonda Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825022357.2852133-3-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c index acc700b..5585a35 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c @@ -2975,9 +2975,12 @@ static void sev_es_init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm) /* * An SEV-ES guest requires a VMSA area that is a separate from the * VMCB page. Do not include the encryption mask on the VMSA physical - * address since hardware will access it using the guest key. + * address since hardware will access it using the guest key. Note, + * the VMSA will be NULL if this vCPU is the destination for intrahost + * migration, and will be copied later. */ - svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa = __pa(svm->sev_es.vmsa); + if (svm->sev_es.vmsa) + svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa = __pa(svm->sev_es.vmsa); /* Can't intercept CR register access, HV can't modify CR registers */ svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR0_READ);