From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:33:08 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: ASoC: omap-dmic: Correct functional clock name
X-Git-Tag: submit/tizen/20141203.153721~3352^2~35^2
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=19118eb8dc3cd6bb1b1fdf0e4ad62070c6683158;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-arm64.git

ASoC: omap-dmic: Correct functional clock name

We should really use "fck" when asking for the functional clock and not
"dmic_fck".
This way we can ensure that multiple dmic modules can exist in the system.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---

diff --git a/sound/soc/omap/omap-dmic.c b/sound/soc/omap/omap-dmic.c
index 68f2cd1a920..5a6aeaf552a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/omap/omap-dmic.c
+++ b/sound/soc/omap/omap-dmic.c
@@ -464,9 +464,9 @@ static __devinit int asoc_dmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	mutex_init(&dmic->mutex);
 
-	dmic->fclk = clk_get(dmic->dev, "dmic_fck");
+	dmic->fclk = clk_get(dmic->dev, "fck");
 	if (IS_ERR(dmic->fclk)) {
-		dev_err(dmic->dev, "cant get dmic_fck\n");
+		dev_err(dmic->dev, "cant get fck\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}