From: Aldy Hernandez Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:13:33 +0000 (+0100) Subject: path solver: Avoid recalculating ranges already in the cache. X-Git-Tag: upstream/12.2.0~3697 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=18546941ae4c56cd9240d2dc2ca2806e01eb6fb7;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fgcc.git path solver: Avoid recalculating ranges already in the cache. The problem here is an ordering issue with a path that starts with 19->3: [local count: 916928331]: # value_20 = PHI # n_27 = PHI n_16 = n_27 + 4; value_17 = value_20 / 10000; if (value_20 > 42949672959999) goto ; [89.00%] else goto ; [11.00%] The problem here is that both value_17 and value_20 are in the set of imports we must pre-calculate. The value_17 name occurs first in the bitmap, so we try to resolve it first, which causes us to recursively solve the value_20 range. We do so correctly and put them both in the cache. However, when we try to solve value_20 from the bitmap, we ignore that it already has a cached entry and try to resolve the PHI with the wrong value of value_17: # value_20 = PHI The right thing to do is to avoid recalculating definitions already solved. Regstrapped and checked for # threads before and after on x86-64 Linux. gcc/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/103120 * gimple-range-path.cc (path_range_query::range_defined_in_block): Bail if there's a cache entry. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/pr103120.c: New test. --- diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc b/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc index 9175651..9d3fe89 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc +++ b/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc @@ -300,6 +300,9 @@ path_range_query::range_defined_in_block (irange &r, tree name, basic_block bb) if (def_bb != bb) return false; + if (get_cache (r, name)) + return true; + if (gimple_code (def_stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI) ssa_range_in_phi (r, as_a (def_stmt)); else diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103120.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103120.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b680a6c --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103120.c @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +// { dg-do run } +// { dg-options "-O2" } + +#define radix 10 +__INT32_TYPE__ numDigits(__UINT64_TYPE__ value) +{ + __INT32_TYPE__ n = 1; + while (value > __UINT32_MAX__) + { + n += 4; + value /= radix * radix * radix * radix; + } + __UINT32_TYPE__ v = (__UINT32_TYPE__)value; + while (1) + { + if (v < radix) + return n; + if (v < radix * radix) + return n + 1; + if (v < radix * radix * radix) + return n + 2; + if (v < radix * radix * radix * radix) + return n + 3; + n += 4; + v /= radix * radix * radix * radix; + } +} + +int main() +{ + if (numDigits(__UINT64_MAX__) != 20) + __builtin_abort(); +}