From: Koro Chen Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:39:03 +0000 (+0800) Subject: ALSA: pcm: Modify double acknowledged interrupts check condition X-Git-Tag: v5.15~15646^2~30 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=13a988396cab68e6c6afd33e461a9e52ce23ff63;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git ALSA: pcm: Modify double acknowledged interrupts check condition Currently in snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0 during interrupt, we consider there were double acknowledged interrupts when: 1. HW reported pointer is smaller than expected, and 2. Time from last update time (hdelta) is over half a buffer time. However, when HW reported pointer is only a few bytes smaller than expected, and when hdelta is just a little larger than half a buffer time (e.g. ping-pong buffer), it wrongly treats this IRQ as double acknowledged. The condition #2 uses jiffies, but jiffies is not high resolution since it is integer. We should consider jiffies inaccuracy. Signed-off-by: Koro Chen Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai --- diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c index ac6b33f..7d45645 100644 --- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c +++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, if (delta > new_hw_ptr) { /* check for double acknowledged interrupts */ hdelta = curr_jiffies - runtime->hw_ptr_jiffies; - if (hdelta > runtime->hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies/2) { + if (hdelta > runtime->hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies/2 + 1) { hw_base += runtime->buffer_size; if (hw_base >= runtime->boundary) { hw_base = 0;