From: Yaxun (Sam) Liu Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:27:02 +0000 (-0500) Subject: [OpenCL] Fix inconsistency between opencl and c11 atomic fetch max/min X-Git-Tag: llvmorg-11-init~1314 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=134ef0fb4b92718477a1dc9da0118f9b2dd77237;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fllvm.git [OpenCL] Fix inconsistency between opencl and c11 atomic fetch max/min There is some inconsistency between opencl and c11 atomic fetch max/min after https://reviews.llvm.org/D46386 https://reviews.llvm.org/D55562 It is not reasonable to have such inconsistencies. This patch fixes that. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71725 --- diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp index b8295bc..d8711fb 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp @@ -4642,8 +4642,6 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildAtomicExpr(SourceRange CallRange, SourceRange ExprRange, case AtomicExpr::AO__c11_atomic_fetch_sub: case AtomicExpr::AO__opencl_atomic_fetch_add: case AtomicExpr::AO__opencl_atomic_fetch_sub: - case AtomicExpr::AO__opencl_atomic_fetch_min: - case AtomicExpr::AO__opencl_atomic_fetch_max: case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_fetch_add: case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_fetch_sub: case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_add_fetch: @@ -4666,6 +4664,8 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildAtomicExpr(SourceRange CallRange, SourceRange ExprRange, case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_nand_fetch: case AtomicExpr::AO__c11_atomic_fetch_min: case AtomicExpr::AO__c11_atomic_fetch_max: + case AtomicExpr::AO__opencl_atomic_fetch_min: + case AtomicExpr::AO__opencl_atomic_fetch_max: case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_min_fetch: case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_max_fetch: case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_fetch_min: diff --git a/clang/test/SemaOpenCL/atomic-ops.cl b/clang/test/SemaOpenCL/atomic-ops.cl index c95c73d..5a8c6fc 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaOpenCL/atomic-ops.cl +++ b/clang/test/SemaOpenCL/atomic-ops.cl @@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ void f(atomic_int *i, const atomic_int *ci, __opencl_atomic_fetch_min(i, 1, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); __opencl_atomic_fetch_max(i, 1, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); - __opencl_atomic_fetch_min(d, 1, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to atomic integer or pointer ('__generic atomic_float *' (aka '__generic _Atomic(float) *') invalid)}} - __opencl_atomic_fetch_max(d, 1, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to atomic integer or pointer ('__generic atomic_float *' (aka '__generic _Atomic(float) *') invalid)}} + __opencl_atomic_fetch_min(d, 1, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to atomic integer ('__generic atomic_float *' (aka '__generic _Atomic(float) *') invalid)}} + __opencl_atomic_fetch_max(d, 1, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to atomic integer ('__generic atomic_float *' (aka '__generic _Atomic(float) *') invalid)}} bool cmpexch_1 = __opencl_atomic_compare_exchange_strong(i, I, 1, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); bool cmpexch_2 = __opencl_atomic_compare_exchange_strong(p, P, 1, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group);